Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] mfd: Support ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF
From: Vaittinen, Matti <hidden>
Date: 2020-11-05 08:58:56
Also in:
linux-watchdog, lkml
On Thu, 2020-11-05 at 08:23 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2020, Lee Jones wrote:quoted
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020, Matti Vaittinen wrote:quoted
Add core support for ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF PMICs which are mainly used to power the R-Car series processors. Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.comquoted
--- drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 11 +++ drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 + drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd957x.h | 59 ++++++++++++++ include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h | 2 + 5 files changed, 203 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/rohm-bd9576.c create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd957x.h[...]quoted
quoted
+static const struct regmap_range volatile_ranges[] = { + { + .range_min = BD957X_REG_SMRB_ASSERT, + .range_max = BD957X_REG_SMRB_ASSERT, + }, + {The way you space your braces is not consistent.quoted
+ .range_min = BD957X_REG_PMIC_INTERNAL_STAT, + .range_max = BD957X_REG_PMIC_INTERNAL_STAT, + }, + { + .range_min = BD957X_REG_INT_THERM_STAT, + .range_max = BD957X_REG_INT_THERM_STAT, + }, + { + .range_min = BD957X_REG_INT_OVP_STAT, + .range_max = BD957X_REG_INT_SYS_STAT, + }, { + .range_min = BD957X_REG_INT_MAIN_STAT, + .range_max = BD957X_REG_INT_MAIN_STAT, + }, +};Don't forget about this. I would prefer to have the braces on the same line (even if it means you have to change an extra line when editing), but I'm not 100% dead set on it. Consistency however, I am.
I won't forget. I intended to write that I was Ok with all the other comments. Maybe I forgot though. Anyways, I'll fix the inconsistency - thanks for pointing it out! --Matti