It was <2020-10-06 wto 12:17>, when Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 12:06, Lukasz Stelmach [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
It was <2020-10-03 sob 12:13>, when Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 at 21:22, Łukasz Stelmach [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Add node for ax88796c ethernet chip.
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@samsung.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5-eval.dts | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5-eval.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5-eval.dts
index 20446a846a98..7f115c348a2a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5-eval.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5-eval.dts
@@ -37,3 +37,24 @@ &mshc_2 {
&serial_2 {
status = "okay";
};
+
+&spi_0 {
+ status = "okay";
+ cs-gpios = <&gpx3 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>, <0>;
+
+ assigned-clocks = <&cmu CLK_MOUT_MPLL>, <&cmu CLK_DIV_MPLL_PRE>, <&cmu CLK_MOUT_SPI0>, <&cmu CLK_DIV_SPI0>, <&cmu CLK_DIV_SPI0_PRE>, <&cmu CLK_SCLK_SPI0>;
No spaces before or after '='.
You mean " = ", don't you?
Ah, of course.
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ assigned-clock-parents = <&cmu CLK_FOUT_MPLL>, <&cmu
CLK_MOUT_MPLL>, <&cmu CLK_DIV_MPLL_PRE>, <&cmu CLK_MOUT_SPI0>, <&cmu
CLK_DIV_SPI0>, <&cmu CLK_DIV_SPI0_PRE>;
This line is still too long. Please wrap it at 80. Checkpatch should
complain about it... so it seems you did not run it. Please fix all
checkpatch issues.
My idea was too keep assigned-clocks and assigned-clock-parrent lines
aligned, so it is clearly visible which parrent applies to which
clock. Is it inappropriate?
The line gets too long and in the existing DTSes we wrapped item by
item. Solution could be to add comments, e.g.:
assigned-clock-parents = <&cmu CLK_FOUT_MPLL>,
<&cmu CLK_DIV_MPLL_PRE>, /* for: CLK_DIV_MPLL_PRE */
<&cmu CLK_MOUT_SPI0>, /* for: CLK_MOUT_SPI0 */
but I am not sure if dtc allows such comments.
make dbts works fine. Changed.
--
Łukasz Stelmach
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics