Thread (42 messages) 42 messages, 13 authors, 2020-11-25

Re: [PATCH v7 03/12] dt-bindings: mfd: Fix schema warnings for pwm-leds

From: Jeff LaBundy <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-06 02:17:42
Also in: linux-amlogic, linux-arm-kernel, linux-leds, linux-mips, linux-omap, linux-samsung-soc, lkml

Hi Alexander,

On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 10:34:42PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain
naming scheme (now).  Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended
by DT project.

  DTC     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml
  CHECK   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml
/home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
        From schema: /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml

Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <redacted>
---

Notes:
    v6 -> v7:
      * added warning message to commit message (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
    
    v6:
      * added this patch to series

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml
index 541b06d80e73..92dc48a8dfa7 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml
@@ -90,10 +90,11 @@ examples:
             };
     };
 
-    pwmleds {
+    led-controller {
             compatible = "pwm-leds";
 
-            panel {
+            led-1 {
+                    label = "panel";
                     pwms = <&iqs620a_pwm 0 1000000>;
                     max-brightness = <255>;
             };
-- 
2.20.1
I like the consistency this brings. My only feedback is that in the other
examples I found (common.yaml and leds-gpio.yaml), the children count off
from 0 (e.g. led-0) instead of 1 as your series appears to.

That's not a huge deal; it simply seems more consistent to count from the
first index allowed by the regex (0). The patch is still fine, and so:

Acked-by: Jeff LaBundy <redacted>

Kind regards,
Jeff LaBundy
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help