Thread (55 messages) 55 messages, 4 authors, 2020-10-09

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: Add binding for discrete onboard USB hubs

From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Date: 2020-10-05 19:18:21
Also in: linux-usb, lkml

On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 12:15:27PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 09:06:55AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 08:41:42AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
quoted
The decision to enable the power regulator at system startup would be 
kernel policy, not a part of the DT description.  But there ought to be 
a standard way of recognizing which resource requirements of this sort 
should be handled at startup.  Then there could be a special module (in 
the driver model core? -- that doesn't really seem appropriate) which 
would search through the whole DT database for resources of this kind 
and enable them.
This might work for some cases that only have a single resource or multiple
resources but no timing/sequencing requirements. For the more complex cases
it would probably end up in something similar to the pwrseq series
(https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=314989&state=%2A&archive=both),
which was nack-ed by Rafael, Rob also expressed he didn't want to go
down that road.

It seems to me that initialization of the resources needs to be done by
the/a driver for the device, which knows about the sequencing requirements.
Potentially this could be done in a pre-probe function that you brought up
earlier.
One of the important points of my suggestion was that the resource init 
should be done _outside_ of the device's driver, precisely because the 
driver module might not even be loaded until the resources are set up 
and the device is discovered.

The conclusion is that we need to have code that is aware of some 
detailed needs of a specific device but is not part of the device's 
driver.  I'm not sure what the best way to implement this would be.
Wouldn't it be possible to load the module when the DT specifies that
the device exists? For USB the kernel would need the VID/PID to identify
the module, these could be extracted from the compatible string.

Having the initialization code outside of the driver could lead to code
duplication, since the driver might want to power the device down in
certain situations (e.g. system suspend).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help