On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 06:15:01PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
Thanks for putting this together.
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 06:17:37PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
index 4602e467ca8b..cd0d115ef329 100644
--- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
+++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#include <linux/serial_core.h>
#include <linux/sysfs.h>
#include <linux/random.h>
+#include <linux/dma-direct.h> /* for zone_dma_bits */
#include <asm/setup.h> /* for COMMAND_LINE_SIZE */
#include <asm/page.h>
@@ -1198,6 +1199,14 @@ void __init early_init_dt_scan_nodes(void)
of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_memory, NULL);
}
+void __init early_init_dt_update_zone_dma_bits(void)
+{
+ unsigned long dt_root = of_get_flat_dt_root();
+
+ if (of_flat_dt_is_compatible(dt_root, "brcm,bcm2711"))
+ zone_dma_bits = 30;
+}
I think we could keep this entirely in the arm64 setup_machine_fdt() and
not pollute the core code with RPi4-specific code.
Actually, even better, could we not move the check to
arm64_memblock_init() when we initialise zone_dma_bits?
--
Catalin