[PATCH v17 00/20] iommu/arm-smmu + drm/msm: per-process GPU pgtables · Rob Clark <hidden> · 2020-09-05
[PATCH v17 18/20] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add compatible string for Adreno GPU SMMU · Rob Clark <hidden> · 2020-09-05
[PATCH v17 20/20] arm: dts: qcom: sc7180: Set the compatible string for the GPU SMMU · Rob Clark <hidden> · 2020-09-05
[PATCH v17 19/20] arm: dts: qcom: sm845: Set the compatible string for the GPU SMMU · Rob Clark <hidden> · 2020-09-05
Re: [PATCH v17 00/20] iommu/arm-smmu + drm/msm: per-process GPU pgtables · Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> · 2020-09-21
Re: [PATCH v17 00/20] iommu/arm-smmu + drm/msm: per-process GPU pgtables · Rob Clark <hidden> · 2020-09-22
Re: [PATCH v17 00/20] iommu/arm-smmu + drm/msm: per-process GPU pgtables · Jordan Crouse <hidden> · 2020-09-22

Re: [PATCH v17 00/20] iommu/arm-smmu + drm/msm: per-process GPU pgtables

From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-09-21 21:31:07
Also in: dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, linux-iommu, lkml

On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 01:04:06PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:

From: Rob Clark <redacted>

NOTE: I have re-ordered the series, and propose that we could merge this
      series in the following order:

       1) 01-11 - merge via drm / msm-next
       2) 12-15 - merge via iommu, no dependency on msm-next pull req

Thanks, I've queued 12-15 in the smmu tree.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git/log/?h=for-joerg/arm-smmu/updates

Will

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help