Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] MAINTAINERS: Add Purism Librem 5 section to the list
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-08-31 01:19:19
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 08:32:01AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 21:15 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:quoted
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 02:17:54PM +0200, Martin Kepplinger wrote:quoted
Add development information for the devicetree files for hardware by Purism SPC. Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <redacted>I decided to drop this patch from my queue, as I took the suggestion from Joe and sent a patch to have get_maintainer report email address in the dts file.It's OK to find maintainers in files, but what about the B: bug reporting and T: source code repository location lines, Those seem useful.
Hmm, I doubt they are practically useful for just a number of dts files. They are more used for out-of-tree Librem5 kernel drivers, I guess. Shawn
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS[]quoted
quoted
@@ -14061,6 +14061,13 @@ T: git git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git F: Documentation/admin-guide/media/pulse8-cec.rst F: drivers/media/cec/usb/pulse8/ +PURISM LIBREM 5 +M: Purism Kernel Team <kernel@puri.sm>People feel like their mails go into a void when no responses happen after sending to nameless addresses. It's better to have a named individual as a maintainer rather than an unspecified exploder address. It's OK to have both, but just the exploder doesn't really have that much value as it's faceless.quoted
quoted
+S: Supported +B: https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/linux-next/issues +T: https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/linux-nextThis T: line should be something else. Perhaps W; https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/linux-next T: git https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/linux-next.gitquoted
quoted
+F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq-librem5*