Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] ARM: dts: imx: add devicetree for Tolino Shine 2 HD
From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
Date: 2020-08-26 06:24:48
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 14:54:41 +0200 Jonathan Neuschäfer [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 09:33:36PM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote:quoted
This adds a devicetree for the Tolino Shine 2 HD Ebook reader. It is based on boards marked with "37NB-E60QF0+4A2". It is equipped with an i.MX6SL SoC. Expected to work: - Buttons - Wifi - Touchscreen - LED - uSD - USB - RTC Not working due to missing drivers: - Backlight (requires NTXEC driver) - EPD Not working due to unknown reasons: - deep sleep (echo standby >/sys/power/state works), wakeup fails when imx_gpc_pre_suspend(true) was called. Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> --- Reason for RFC: The suspend trouble might be caused by bad devicetree. But as the devicetree is already useful I decided to submit it.[...]quoted
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sl-tolino-shine2hd.dts@@ -0,0 +1,582 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0)I don't think the parentheses are required when you don't have a logical operator (OR) in the SPDX expression.quoted
+&i2c1 { + pinctrl-names = "default","sleep"; + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_i2c1>; + pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_i2c1_sleep>; + status = "okay"; + + /* TODO: embedded controller at 0x43 (driver missing) */Sorry for the delay, BTW. I'm still (slowly) working on v2.quoted
+ ricoh619: pmic@32 { + compatible = "ricoh,rc5t619"; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ricoh_gpio>; + reg = <0x32>; + interrupt-parent = <&gpio5>; + interrupts = <11 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>; + system-power-controller; + + regulators {How did you derive the regulator voltages?
Several sources: - deriving from the existing device trees, - looking for board specific variances in board-mx6sl_ntx.c of the Tolino kernel, - looking for comments in the file. I compared a register dump of the PMIC from both the vendor kernel and my devicetree and found no significant differences.
quoted
+ pinctrl_hog: hoggrp { + fsl,pins = < + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT0__GPIO2_IO20 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT1__GPIO2_IO21 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT2__GPIO2_IO22 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT3__GPIO2_IO23 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT4__GPIO2_IO24 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT5__GPIO2_IO25 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT6__GPIO2_IO26 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT7__GPIO2_IO27 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT8__GPIO2_IO28 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT9__GPIO2_IO29 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT10__GPIO2_IO30 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT11__GPIO2_IO31 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT12__GPIO3_IO00 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT13__GPIO3_IO01 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT14__GPIO3_IO02 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT15__GPIO3_IO03 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT16__GPIO3_IO04 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT17__GPIO3_IO05 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT18__GPIO3_IO06 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT19__GPIO3_IO07 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT20__GPIO3_IO08 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT21__GPIO3_IO09 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT22__GPIO3_IO10 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_DAT23__GPIO3_IO11 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_CLK__GPIO2_IO15 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_ENABLE__GPIO2_IO16 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_HSYNC__GPIO2_IO17 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_VSYNC__GPIO2_IO18 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_LCD_RESET__GPIO2_IO19 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_KEY_COL3__GPIO3_IO30 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_KEY_ROW7__GPIO4_IO07 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_ECSPI2_MOSI__GPIO4_IO13 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_KEY_COL5__GPIO4_IO02 0x79 + MX6SL_PAD_KEY_ROW6__GPIO4_IO05 0x79 + >; + };Why are there so many hogged pins? Will some of them receive a proper configuration once the EPDC driver is implemented?
I copied them over and found no hints in the Tolino kernel that it is a bad idea. Regards, Andreas