Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] soc: mediatek: add mtk-devapc driver
From: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-08-01 00:13:11
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, lkml
Hi, Neal: This patch is for "mediatek,mt6779-devapc", so I think commit title should show the SoC ID. Neal Liu [off-list ref] 於 2020年7月29日 週三 下午4:29寫道:
MediaTek bus fabric provides TrustZone security support and data protection to prevent slaves from being accessed by unexpected masters. The security violation is logged and sent to the processor for further analysis or countermeasures. Any occurrence of security violation would raise an interrupt, and it will be handled by mtk-devapc driver. The violation information is printed in order to find the murderer. Signed-off-by: Neal Liu <redacted> ---
[snip]
+
+struct mtk_devapc_context {
+ struct device *dev;
+ u32 vio_idx_num;
+ void __iomem *devapc_pd_base;
+ struct mtk_devapc_vio_info *vio_info;
+ const struct mtk_devapc_pd_offset *offset;
+ const struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs *vio_dbgs;
+};
I think this structure should separate the constant part. The constant part is:
struct mtk_devapc_data {
const u32 vio_idx_num;
const struct mtk_devapc_pd_offset *offset; /* I would like to
remove struct mtk_devapc_pd_offset and directly put its member into
this structure */
const struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs *vio_dbgs; /* This may disappear */
};
And the context is:
struct mtk_devapc_context {
struct device *dev;
void __iomem *devapc_pd_base;
const struct mtk_devapc_data *data;
};
So when you define this, you would not waste memory to store non-constant data.
static const struct mtk_devapc_data devapc_mt6779 = {
.vio_idx_num = 510,
.offset = &mt6779_pd_offset,
.vio_dbgs = &mt6779_vio_dbgs,
};
Regards,
Chun-Kuang.
+ +#endif /* __MTK_DEVAPC_H__ */ -- 1.7.9.5 _______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek