Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 2 authors, 2020-07-27

Re: [PATCH v8 00/10] dmaengine: dw: Take Baikal-T1 SoC DW DMAC peculiarities into account

From: Serge Semin <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-27 20:55:33
Also in: dmaengine, lkml

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 02:31:14PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 23-07-20, 03:58, Serge Semin wrote:
quoted
In the previous patchset I've written the next message:
quoted
Folks, note I've removed the next patches from the series:
[PATCH v7 04/11] dmaengine: Introduce max SG list entries capability
[PATCH v7 11/11] dmaengine: dw: Initialize max_sg_nents capability
It turns out the problem with the asynchronous handling of Tx- and Rx-
SPI transfers interrupts is more complex than I expected. So in order to
solve the problem it isn't enough to split the SG list entries submission
up based on the max_sg_nents capability setting (though the synchronous
one-by-one SG list entries handling does fix a part of the problem). So
if and when I get to find a comprehensive solution for it I'll submit a
new series with fixups. Until then please consider to merge the patchset
in without those patches.
Those patches are returned back to the series. I've found a solution, which
fixes the problem for our hardware. A new patchset with several fixes for the
DW DMAC driver will be sent shortly after this one is merged in. Note the same
concerns the DW APB SPI driver. So please review and merge in as soon as
possible.

Regarding the patchset. Baikal-T1 SoC has an DW DMAC on-board to provide a
Mem-to-Mem, low-speed peripherals Dev-to-Mem and Mem-to-Dev functionality.
Mostly it's compatible with currently implemented in the kernel DW DMAC
driver, but there are some peculiarities which must be taken into account
in order to have the device fully supported.

First of all traditionally we replaced the legacy plain text-based dt-binding
file with yaml-based one. Secondly Baikal-T1 DW DMA Controller provides eight
channels, which alas have different max burst length configuration.
In particular first two channels may burst up to 128 bits (16 bytes) at a time
while the rest of them just up to 32 bits. We must make sure that the DMA
subsystem doesn't set values exceeding these limitations otherwise the
controller will hang up. In third currently we discovered the problem in using
the DW APB SPI driver together with DW DMAC. The problem happens if there is no
natively implemented multi-block LLP transfers support and the SPI-transfer
length exceeds the max lock size. In this case due to asynchronous handling of
Tx- and Rx- SPI transfers interrupt we might end up with DW APB SSI Rx FIFO
overflow. So if DW APB SSI (or any other DMAC service consumer) intends to use
the DMAC to asynchronously execute the transfers we'd have to at least warn
the user of the possible errors. In forth it's worth to set the DMA device max
segment size with max block size config specific to the DW DMA controller. It
shall help the DMA clients to create size-optimized SG-list items for the
controller. This in turn will cause less dw_desc allocations, less LLP
reinitializations, better DMA device performance.

Finally there is a bug in the algorithm of the nollp flag detection.
In particular even if DW DMAC parameters state the multi-block transfers
support there is still HC_LLP (hardcode LLP) flag, which if set makes expected
by the driver true multi-block LLP functionality unusable. This happens cause'
if HC_LLP flag is set the LLP registers will be hardcoded to zero so the
contiguous multi-block transfers will be only supported. We must take the
flag into account when detecting the LLP support otherwise the driver just
won't work correctly.
Applied all, thanks
Great! Thank you very much. Now I can send out another set of patches for
review.

-Sergey
-- 
~Vinod
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help