Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Adding support for Microchip Sparx5 SoC
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2020-07-27 11:07:38
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, linux-gpio, lkml
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2020-07-27 11:07:38
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, linux-gpio, lkml
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:30 PM Lars Povlsen [off-list ref] wrote:
Alexandre Belloni writes:quoted
As Arnd stated, he already applied the patches so you have to send an incremental patch to fix the clock driver.I actually wrote Arnd about this specifically, and he replied that a patch against either next or mainline was fine - so that's why I refreshed the lot (Including Reviewed-by: headers).
I think I misunderstood your question. To clarify: Alexandre is right, you should not resend patches that have already been merged but instead send the incremental patches if you need further changes. I thought your question was about the case where your patch series has conflicts against another unrelated set of changes that may have been merged already.
But I will send an incremental patch just in case, no problem.
Thanks,
Arnd