Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 3 authors, 2020-07-27

Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Adding support for Microchip Sparx5 SoC

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2020-07-27 11:07:38
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, linux-gpio, lkml

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:30 PM Lars Povlsen
[off-list ref] wrote:
Alexandre Belloni writes:
quoted
As Arnd stated, he already applied the patches so you have to send an
incremental patch to fix the clock driver.
I actually wrote Arnd about this specifically, and he replied that a
patch against either next or mainline was fine - so that's why I
refreshed the lot (Including Reviewed-by: headers).
I think I misunderstood your question. To clarify: Alexandre is right,
you should not resend patches that have already been merged but
instead send the incremental patches if you need further changes.

I thought your question was about the case where your patch
series has conflicts against another unrelated set of changes
that may have been merged already.
But I will send an incremental patch just in case, no problem.
Thanks,

      Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help