Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 2 authors, 2020-08-06

Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] dmaengine: mediatek-cqdma: remove redundant queue structure

From: EastL <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-23 02:34:17
Also in: dmaengine, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, lkml

On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 11:49 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 02-07-20, 15:06, EastL Lee wrote:
quoted
 static enum dma_status mtk_cqdma_tx_status(struct dma_chan *c,
 					   dma_cookie_t cookie,
 					   struct dma_tx_state *txstate)
 {
-	struct mtk_cqdma_vchan *cvc = to_cqdma_vchan(c);
-	struct mtk_cqdma_vdesc *cvd;
-	struct virt_dma_desc *vd;
-	enum dma_status ret;
-	unsigned long flags;
-	size_t bytes = 0;
-
-	ret = dma_cookie_status(c, cookie, txstate);
-	if (ret == DMA_COMPLETE || !txstate)
-		return ret;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&cvc->vc.lock, flags);
-	vd = mtk_cqdma_find_active_desc(c, cookie);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cvc->vc.lock, flags);
-
-	if (vd) {
-		cvd = to_cqdma_vdesc(vd);
-		bytes = cvd->residue;
-	}
-
-	dma_set_residue(txstate, bytes);
any reason why you want to remove setting residue?
Because Mediatek CQDMA HW can't support residue.
quoted
-static void mtk_cqdma_free_active_desc(struct dma_chan *c)
+static int mtk_cqdma_terminate_all(struct dma_chan *c)
 {
 	struct mtk_cqdma_vchan *cvc = to_cqdma_vchan(c);
-	bool sync_needed = false;
+	struct virt_dma_chan *vc = to_virt_chan(c);
 	unsigned long pc_flags;
 	unsigned long vc_flags;
+	LIST_HEAD(head);
+
+	/* wait for the VC to be inactive  */
+	if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&cvc->cmp, msecs_to_jiffies(3000)))
+		return -EAGAIN;
 
 	/* acquire PC's lock first due to lock dependency in dma ISR */
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&cvc->pc->lock, pc_flags);
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&cvc->vc.lock, vc_flags);
 
-	/* synchronization is required if this VC is active */
-	if (mtk_cqdma_is_vchan_active(cvc)) {
-		cvc->issue_synchronize = true;
-		sync_needed = true;
-	}
+	/* get VDs from lists */
+	vchan_get_all_descriptors(vc, &head);
+
+	/* free all the VDs */
+	vchan_dma_desc_free_list(vc, &head);
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cvc->vc.lock, vc_flags);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cvc->pc->lock, pc_flags);
Good cleanup, do you need both these locks?
Yes, because we will have multiple vc to pc, it will need both lock.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help