Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: backlight: Convert common backlight bindings to DT schema
From: Daniel Thompson <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-30 16:35:48
Also in:
dri-devel, lkml
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 09:18:47PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:57:37AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:57 AM Daniel Thompson [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:53:41PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:quoted
quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/pwm-backlight.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/pwm-backlight.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7e1f109a38a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/pwm-backlight.yaml@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/leds/backlight/pwm-backlight.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: pwm-backlight bindings + +maintainers: + - Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> + - Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> + - Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com> + +properties: + compatible: + const: pwm-backlight + + pwms: + maxItems: 1 + + pwm-names: true + + power-supply: + description: regulator for supply voltage + + enable-gpios: + description: Contains a single GPIO specifier for the GPIO which enables + and disables the backlight + maxItems: 1 + + post-pwm-on-delay-ms: + description: Delay in ms between setting an initial (non-zero) PWM and + enabling the backlight using GPIO. + + pwm-off-delay-ms: + description: Delay in ms between disabling the backlight using GPIO + and setting PWM value to 0. + + brightness-levels: + description: Array of distinct brightness levels. Typically these are + in the range from 0 to 255, but any range starting at 0 will do. The + actual brightness level (PWM duty cycle) will be interpolated from + these values. 0 means a 0% duty cycle (darkest/off), while the last + value in the array represents a 100% duty cycle (brightest). + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array + + default-brightness-level: + description: The default brightness level (index into the array defined + by the "brightness-levels" property). + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32Same comment as before...Sorry the "ditto" meant I didn't thing about PWM as much as I should have. The situation for PWM is a little different to LED. That's mostly because we decided not to clutter the LED code with "num-interpolated-steps". The PWM code implements the default-brightness-level as an index into the brightness array *after* it has been expanded using interpolation. In other words today Linux treats the default-brightness-level more like[1]. description: The default brightness level. When num-interpolated-steps is not set this is simply an index into the array defined by the "brightness-levels" property. If num-interpolated-steps is set the brightness array will be expanded by interpolation before we index to get a default level. This is the best I have come up with so far... but I concede it still lacks elegance.Happy to add this or whatever folks want if there's agreement, but I don't want to get bogged down on re-reviewing and re-writing the binding on what is just a conversion. There's a mountain of bindings to convert.The original explanation is ok, as pointed out by Daniel. So I suggest moving forward with that and then others can improve the descriptions later as necessary.
That's fine for me to. It would be clearer in version history (improving definitions during a conversion hides them when mining the changelog). Daniel.