Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 2 authors, 2020-07-20

Re: [v3] arm64: dts: sc7180: add nodes for idp display

From: Stephen Boyd <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-25 01:07:28
Also in: dri-devel, linux-arm-msm, lkml

Quoting Harigovindan P (2020-02-17 00:58:42)
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts
index 388f50ad4fde..349db8fe78a5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts
@@ -232,6 +233,57 @@ vreg_bob: bob {
        };
 };
 
+&dsi0 {
+       status = "okay";
+
+       vdda-supply = <&vreg_l3c_1p2>;
+
+       panel@0 {
+               compatible = "visionox,rm69299-1080p-display";
+               reg = <0>;
+
+               vdda-supply = <&vreg_l8c_1p8>;
+               vdd3p3-supply = <&vreg_l18a_2p8>;
+
+               pinctrl-names = "default";
+               pinctrl-0 = <&disp_pins>;
+
+               reset-gpios = <&pm6150l_gpio 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+
+               ports {
+                       #address-cells = <1>;
+                       #size-cells = <0>;
+                       port@0 {
+                               reg = <0>;
+                               panel0_in: endpoint {
+                                       remote-endpoint = <&dsi0_out>;
+                               };
+                       };
+               };
+       };
+
+       ports {
+               port@1 {
+                       endpoint {
+                               remote-endpoint = <&panel0_in>;
+                               data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>;
Is this property needed? If it's the default assumption it would be nice
to omit it so that we don't have to think about it.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+                       };
+               };
+       };
+};
+
+&dsi_phy {
+       status = "okay";
+};
+
+&mdp {
+       status = "okay";
+};
+
+&mdss {
+       status = "okay";
+};
+
 &qspi {
        status = "okay";
        pinctrl-names = "default";
@@ -289,6 +341,17 @@ &usb_1_qmpphy {
 
 /* PINCTRL - additions to nodes defined in sc7180.dtsi */
 
+&pm6150l_gpio {
+       disp_pins: disp-pins {
Curious how this works. It looks like PMIC GPIOS are expecting the node
to look like:

	disp_pins: disp-pins {
		pinconf {
			pins = "gpio3";
			function = PMIC_GPIO_FUNC_FUNC1;
			qcom,drive-strength = <PMIC_GPIO_STRENGTH_MED>;
			power-source = <PM6150_GPIO_VPH>;
			bias-disable;
			output-low;
		};

but this doesn't use the macros or the subnode for pinconf. Why? Also,
the PM6150_GPIO_VPH macro doesn't exist.
+               pins = "gpio3";
+               function = "func1";
+               qcom,drive-strength = <2>;
+               power-source = <0>;
+               bias-disable;
+               output-low;
+       };
+};
+
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help