Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] usb: dwc3: qcom: Add interconnect support in dwc3 driver
From: Sandeep Maheswaram (Temp) <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-16 04:53:19
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-usb, lkml
On 6/16/2020 1:12 AM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 04:16:31AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:quoted
Quoting Sandeep Maheswaram (Temp) (2020-06-04 02:43:09)quoted
On 6/3/2020 11:06 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:quoted
Quoting Sandeep Maheswaram (2020-03-31 22:15:43)quoted
diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c index 1dfd024..d33ae86 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c@@ -285,6 +307,101 @@ static int dwc3_qcom_resume(struct dwc3_qcom *qcom) return 0; } + +/** + * dwc3_qcom_interconnect_init() - Get interconnect path handles + * @qcom: Pointer to the concerned usb core. + * + */ +static int dwc3_qcom_interconnect_init(struct dwc3_qcom *qcom) +{ + struct device *dev = qcom->dev; + int ret; + + if (!device_is_bound(&qcom->dwc3->dev)) + return -EPROBE_DEFER;How is this supposed to work? I see that this was added in an earlier revision of this patch series but there isn't any mention of why device_is_bound() is used here. It would be great if there was a comment detailing why this is necessary. It sounds like maximum_speed is important? Furthermore, dwc3_qcom_interconnect_init() is called by dwc3_qcom_probe() which is the function that registers the device for qcom->dwc3->dev. If that device doesn't probe between the time it is registered by dwc3_qcom_probe() and this function is called then we'll fail dwc3_qcom_probe() with -EPROBE_DEFER. And that will remove the qcom->dwc3->dev device from the platform bus because we call of_platform_depopulate() on the error path of dwc3_qcom_probe(). So isn't this whole thing racy and can potentially lead us to a driver probe loop where the wrapper (dwc3_qcom) and the core (dwc3) are probing and we're trying to time it just right so that driver for dwc3 binds before we setup interconnects? I don't know if dwc3 can communicate to the wrapper but that would be more of a direct way to do this. Or maybe the wrapper should try to read the DT property for maximum speed and fallback to a worst case high bandwidth value if it can't figure it out itself without help from dwc3 core.This was added in V4 to address comments from Matthias in V3 https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11148587/Yes, that why I said: "I see that this was added in an earlier revision of this patch series but there isn't any mention of why device_is_bound() is used here. It would be great if there was a comment detailing why this is necessary. It sounds like maximum_speed is important?" Can you please respond to the rest of my email?I agree with Stephen that using device_is_bound() isn't a good option in this case, when I suggested it I wasn't looking at the big picture of how probing the core driver is triggered, sorry about that. Reading the speed from the DT with usb_get_maximum_speed() as Stephen suggests would be an option, the inconvenient is that we then essentially require the property to be defined, while the core driver gets a suitable value from hardware registers. Not sure if the wrapper driver could read from the same registers. One option could be to poll device_is_bound() for 100 ms (or so), with sleeps between polls. It's not elegant but would probably work if we don't find a better solution.
if (np)
ret = dwc3_qcom_of_register_core(pdev);
else
ret = dwc3_qcom_acpi_register_core(pdev);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to register DWC3 Core, err=%d\n", ret);
goto depopulate;
}
ret = dwc3_qcom_interconnect_init(qcom);
if (ret)
goto depopulate;
qcom->mode = usb_get_dr_mode(&qcom->dwc3->dev);
Before calling dwc3_qcom_interconnect_init we are checking
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to register DWC3 Core, err=%d\n", ret);
goto depopulate;
}
Doesn't this condition confirm the core driver is probed?
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation