On Sun, 10 May 2020 08:51:46 +0200
Boris Brezillon [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri,  8 May 2020 19:13:38 +0200
Miquel Raynal [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

+			pktsize = DIV_ROUND_UP(nfc_op->len, nfc_op->steps);
+			nfc_op->pkt_reg |= PKT_SIZE(round_up(pktsize, 4)) |
+					   PKT_STEPS(nfc_op->steps);  

I thought we agreed on reject any mismatch in the size. Any reason for

			 ^rejecting

not being strict here?