[PATCH v7 17/24] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Hook up ATC invalidation to mm ops
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <hidden>
Date: 2020-05-19 18:02:33
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-iommu, linux-mm, linux-pci
Subsystem:
iommu subsystem, the rest · Maintainers:
Joerg Roedel, Will Deacon, Linus Torvalds
The invalidate_range() notifier is called for any change to the address space. Perform the required ATC invalidations. Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <redacted> --- v6->v7: invalidate() doesn't need RCU protection anymore. --- drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 00a9342eed99..1386d4d2bc60 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c@@ -2392,6 +2392,20 @@ arm_smmu_atc_inv_to_cmd(int ssid, unsigned long iova, size_t size, size_t inval_grain_shift = 12; unsigned long page_start, page_end; + /* + * ATS and PASID: + * + * If substream_valid is clear, the PCIe TLP is sent without a PASID + * prefix. In that case all ATC entries within the address range are + * invalidated, including those that were requested with a PASID! There + * is no way to invalidate only entries without PASID. + * + * When using STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_SSID0 (reserving CD 0 for non-PASID + * traffic), translation requests without PASID create ATC entries + * without PASID, which must be invalidated with substream_valid clear. + * This has the unpleasant side-effect of invalidating all PASID-tagged + * ATC entries within the address range. + */ *cmd = (struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent) { .opcode = CMDQ_OP_ATC_INV, .substream_valid = !!ssid,
@@ -2435,12 +2449,12 @@ arm_smmu_atc_inv_to_cmd(int ssid, unsigned long iova, size_t size, cmd->atc.size = log2_span; } -static int arm_smmu_atc_inv_master(struct arm_smmu_master *master) +static int arm_smmu_atc_inv_master(struct arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid) { int i; struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent cmd; - arm_smmu_atc_inv_to_cmd(0, 0, 0, &cmd); + arm_smmu_atc_inv_to_cmd(ssid, 0, 0, &cmd); for (i = 0; i < master->num_sids; i++) { cmd.atc.sid = master->sids[i];
@@ -2968,7 +2982,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_disable_ats(struct arm_smmu_master *master) * ATC invalidation via the SMMU. */ wmb(); - arm_smmu_atc_inv_master(master); + arm_smmu_atc_inv_master(master, 0); atomic_dec(&smmu_domain->nr_ats_masters); }
@@ -3169,7 +3183,10 @@ static void arm_smmu_mm_invalidate_range(struct mmu_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start, unsigned long end) { - /* TODO: invalidate ATS */ + struct arm_smmu_mmu_notifier *smmu_mn = mn_to_smmu(mn); + + arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain(smmu_mn->domain, mm->pasid, start, + end - start + 1); } static void arm_smmu_mm_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct *mm)
@@ -3190,7 +3207,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_mm_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct *mm) arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(smmu_domain, mm->pasid, &invalid_cd); arm_smmu_tlb_inv_asid(smmu_domain->smmu, smmu_mn->cd->asid); - /* TODO: invalidate ATS */ + arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain(smmu_domain, mm->pasid, 0, 0); smmu_mn->cleared = true; mutex_unlock(&sva_lock);
@@ -3281,7 +3298,7 @@ void arm_smmu_mmu_notifier_put(struct arm_smmu_mmu_notifier *smmu_mn) */ if (!smmu_mn->cleared) { arm_smmu_tlb_inv_asid(smmu_domain->smmu, cd->asid); - /* TODO: invalidate ATS */ + arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain(smmu_domain, mm->pasid, 0, 0); } /* Frees smmu_mn */
--
2.26.2