Re: [PATCH 0/3] Request direct mapping for modem firmware subdevice
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-12 06:28:52
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-iommu, linux-remoteproc, lkml
Hi Robin, On 2020-03-10 22:14, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 10/03/2020 4:23 pm, Joerg Roedel wrote:quoted
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 07:30:50PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:quoted
The accesses are initiated by the firmware and they access modem reserved regions. However as explained in ^^ any accesses outside the region will result in a violation and is controlled through XPUs (protection units).Okay, this sounds like a case for arm_smmu_get_resv_region(). It should return an entry for the reserved memory region the firmware needs to access, so that generic iommu can setup this mapping. Note that it should return that entry only for your device, not for all devices. Maybe there is a property in DT or IORT you can set to transport this information into the arm-smmu driver. This is pretty similar to RMRR mapping on the Intel VT-d IOMMU or Unity-mapped ranges in the AMD-Vi IOMMU.Yup, a way to describe boot-time memory regions in IORT is in the process of being specced out; the first attempt at an equivalent for DT is here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20191209150748.2471814-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com/ (local) If that's not enough and the SMMU still needs to treat certain Stream IDs specially because they may be untranslatable (due to having direct access to memory as a side-channel), then that should be handled in the SoC-specific corner of the SMMU driver, not delegated to individual endpoint drivers.
Are you talking about this one for SoC specific change - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1183530/ Thanks, Sai -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation