Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: power: Fix dt_binding_check error

Rob Herring [off-list ref] writes:

On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:31 AM Kevin Hilman [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hi Jianxin,

Jianxin Pan [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Missing ';' in the end of secure-monitor example node.

Fixes: 165b5fb294e8 ("dt-bindings: power: add Amlogic secure power domains bindings")
Reported-by: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jianxin Pan <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/amlogic,meson-sec-pwrc.yaml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/amlogic,meson-sec-pwrc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/amlogic,meson-sec-pwrc.yaml
index af32209..bc4e037 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/amlogic,meson-sec-pwrc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/amlogic,meson-sec-pwrc.yaml

@@ -36,5 +36,5 @@ examples:
             compatible = "amlogic,meson-a1-pwrc";
             #power-domain-cells = <1>;
         };
-    }
+    };

Thanks for the fix.  Queued for v5.7.

@Arnd, @Olof: you can ignore this one.  I requested Jianxin to send to
you thinking this was a fix for something you already queued, but it's
not.  I'll handle it.

Someone has what needs fixing queued in linux-next, but this fix is
still not there. Somehow it seems like features show up in linux-next
faster than fixes for SoC tree...

The fix (this patch) is queued in my 'for-next' branch which I pushed
yesterday.  I guess it missed next-20200310 but should be in tomorrow.

Kevin


[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-amlogic.git/log/?h=for-next