Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 3 authors, 2020-03-06

Re: [PATCH v3 03/14] iommu/mediatek: Add device_link between the consumer and the larb devices

From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Date: 2020-03-06 07:01:00
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-iommu, linux-mediatek, lkml

On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 13:14 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 5:38 PM Yong Wu [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
MediaTek IOMMU don't have its power-domain. all the consumer connect
with smi-larb, then connect with smi-common.

        M4U
         |
    smi-common
         |
  -------------
  |         |    ...
  |         |
larb1     larb2
  |         |
vdec       venc

When the consumer works, it should enable the smi-larb's power which
also need enable the smi-common's power firstly.

Thus, First of all, use the device link connect the consumer and the
smi-larbs. then add device link between the smi-larb and smi-common.

This patch adds device_link between the consumer and the larbs.

When device_link_add, I add the flag DL_FLAG_STATELESS to avoid calling
pm_runtime_xx to keep the original status of clocks. It can avoid two
issues:
1) Display HW show fastlogo abnormally reported in [1]. At the beggining,
all the clocks are enabled before entering kernel, but the clocks for
display HW(always in larb0) will be gated after clk_enable and clk_disable
called from device_link_add(->pm_runtime_resume) and rpm_idle. The clock
operation happened before display driver probe. At that time, the display
HW will be abnormal.

2) A deadlock issue reported in [2]. Use DL_FLAG_STATELESS to skip
pm_runtime_xx to avoid the deadlock.

Corresponding, DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER can't be added, then
device_link_removed should be added explicitly.

[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2019-July/
021500.html
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1086569/

Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c    | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
index b138b94..2511b3c 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
@@ -450,6 +450,9 @@ static int mtk_iommu_add_device(struct device *dev)
        struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
        struct mtk_iommu_data *data;
        struct iommu_group *group;
+       struct device_link *link;
+       struct device *larbdev;
+       unsigned int larbid;

        if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops)
                return -ENODEV; /* Not a iommu client device */
@@ -461,6 +464,14 @@ static int mtk_iommu_add_device(struct device *dev)
        if (IS_ERR(group))
                return PTR_ERR(group);

+       /* Link the consumer device with the smi-larb device(supplier) */
+       larbid = MTK_M4U_TO_LARB(fwspec->ids[0]);
I'll mirror the comment I made on gerrit
(https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/1361013):
Maybe I'm missing something here, but for example, on MT8173,
vcodec_enc: vcodec@18002000 needs to use both larb3 and larb5, isn't
the code below just adding a link for larb3?
Yes. It only add larb3 here.
Do we need to iterate over all fwspecs->ids to figure out which larbs
we need to add links to each of them?
We have checked this venc issue. Currently I have requested our venc guy
to seperate larb3-venc and larb5-venc in the driver[1] since they are
independent HW actually. I will put it into this series when I send next
version.

If there is some reasonable driver which have two larbs in it, then the
iterating is really necessary, But I don't see it right now. Only using
fwspec->ids[0] is enough for now.

[1]
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/1958322
quoted
+       larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev;
+       link = device_link_add(dev, larbdev,
+                              DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_STATELESS);
+       if (!link)
+               dev_err(dev, "Unable to link %s\n", dev_name(larbdev));
+
        iommu_group_put(group);
        return 0;
 }
@@ -469,6 +480,8 @@ static void mtk_iommu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
 {
        struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
        struct mtk_iommu_data *data;
+       struct device *larbdev;
+       unsigned int larbid;

        if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops)
                return;
@@ -476,6 +489,10 @@ static void mtk_iommu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
        data = fwspec->iommu_priv;
        iommu_device_unlink(&data->iommu, dev);

+       larbid = MTK_M4U_TO_LARB(fwspec->ids[0]);
+       larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev;
+       device_link_remove(dev, larbdev);
+
        iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
        iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c
index 2034d72..a7f22a2 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c
@@ -423,7 +423,9 @@ static int mtk_iommu_add_device(struct device *dev)
        struct of_phandle_iterator it;
        struct mtk_iommu_data *data;
        struct iommu_group *group;
-       int err;
+       struct device_link *link;
+       struct device *larbdev;
+       int err, larbid;

        of_for_each_phandle(&it, err, dev->of_node, "iommus",
                        "#iommu-cells", 0) {
@@ -466,6 +468,14 @@ static int mtk_iommu_add_device(struct device *dev)
                return err;
        }

+       /* Link the consumer device with the smi-larb device(supplier) */
+       larbid = mt2701_m4u_to_larb(fwspec->ids[0]);
+       larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev;
+       link = device_link_add(dev, larbdev,
+                              DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_STATELESS);
+       if (!link)
+               dev_err(dev, "Unable to link %s\n", dev_name(larbdev));
+
        return iommu_device_link(&data->iommu, dev);
 }
@@ -473,6 +483,8 @@ static void mtk_iommu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
 {
        struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
        struct mtk_iommu_data *data;
+       struct device *larbdev;
+       unsigned int larbid;

        if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops)
                return;
@@ -480,6 +492,10 @@ static void mtk_iommu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
        data = fwspec->iommu_priv;
        iommu_device_unlink(&data->iommu, dev);

+       larbid = mt2701_m4u_to_larb(fwspec->ids[0]);
+       larbdev = data->larb_imu[larbid].dev;
+       device_link_remove(dev, larbdev);
+
        iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
        iommu_fwspec_free(dev);
 }
--
1.9.1
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help