On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 05:40:31PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 5:28 PM Mark Brown [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

It's what we do for other properties, and if this is anything like the
other things adding extra wiring you can't assume that the ability to
use the feature for TX implies RX.

Double Transfer Rate uses the same wire.

But is it still on either the TX or RX signals?

But as you sample at both the rising and the falling edges of the clock, this
makes the cpha setting meaningless for such transfers, I think ;-)

Might affect what the first bit is possibly?

However, as the future may bring us QDR, perhaps this should not be a
boolean flag, but an integer value?
Cfr. spi-tx-bus-width vs. the original spi-tx-dual/spi-tx-quad proposal.

What would be a good name (as we only need one)? spi-data-phases?

Sounds reasonable, apart from the increasingly vague connection with
something that's recognizably SPI :P