Thread (25 messages) flat view 25 messages, 5 authors, 2020-02-24

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next/devicetree 0/5] DT bindings for Felix DSA switch on LS1028A

From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-02-24 08:48:35
Also in: lkml, netdev

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 09:59:53AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
Hi Shawn,

On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 08:32, Shawn Guo [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 05:12:54PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
quoted
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

As per feedback received in v1, I've changed the DT bindings for the
internal ports from "gmii" to "internal". So I would like the entire
series to be merged through a single tree, be it net-next or devicetree.
Will applying the patches via different trees as normal cause any
issue like build breakage or regression on either tree?  Otherwise, I do
not see the series needs to go in through a single tree.

Shawn
No, the point is that I've made some changes in the device tree
bindings validation in the driver, which make the driver without those
changes incompatible with the bindings themselves that I'm
introducing. So I would like the driver to be operational on the
actual commit that introduces the bindings, at least in your tree. I
don't expect merge conflicts to occur in that area of the code.
The dt-bindings patch is supposed to go through subsystem tree together
with driver changes by nature.  That said, patch #1 and #2 are for
David, and I will pick up the rest (DTS ones).

Shawn
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help