Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] ARM: dts: imx: Add GW5907 board support
From: Bobby Jones <hidden>
Date: 2019-12-23 22:55:32
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 2:06 PM Fabio Estevam [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Robert, On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 6:44 PM Robert Jones [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
The Gateworks GW5907 is an IMX6 SoC based single board computer with: - IMX6Q or IMX6DL - 32bit DDR3 DRAM - FEC GbE Phy - bi-color front-panel LED - 256MB NAND boot device - Gateworks System Controller (hwmon, pushbutton controller, EEPROM) - Digital IO expander (pca9555) - Joystick 12bit adc (ads1015) Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> Signed-off-by: Robert Jones <redacted>Not clear on the authorship on this patch. If the original author is Tim, then his name should appear in the From field.
Original author for all but the GW5910 patch was myself. It's probably not clear here but Tim reviewed the patches prior to submission and had me add him as a Signed-off-by. Would it be better to just remove those lines from the patches in this case?
quoted
--- arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 2 + arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-gw5907.dts | 14 ++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-gw5907.dts | 14 ++ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-gw5907.dtsi | 399 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 429 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-gw5907.dts create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-gw5907.dts create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-gw5907.dtsidiff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile index 1e9e1af..9ee80e2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile@@ -422,6 +422,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX6Q) += \ imx6dl-gw560x.dtb \ imx6dl-gw5903.dtb \ imx6dl-gw5904.dtb \ + imx6dl-gw5907.dtb \You should add an additional patch that add these new boards in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
So I was planning on just adding an enum line for "gw,ventana" under the i.MX6DL and i.MX6Q based Boards sections. Would that be sufficient? We have a lot of individual custom boards and it doesn't seem correct to add individual strings for every one in both sections.