Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] dt-bindings: tpm: Add the TPM TIS I2C device tree binding documentaion
From: Amir Mizinski <hidden>
Date: 2019-11-24 18:02:25
Also in:
linux-integrity, lkml
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:10 PM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:21:36PM +0200, amirmizi6@gmail.com wrote:quoted
From: Amir Mizinski <redacted> this file aim at documenting TPM TIS I2C related dt-bindings for the I2C PTP based Physical TPM. Signed-off-by: Amir Mizinski <redacted> --- .../bindings/security/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c.txt | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c.txtPlease make this a schema. See Documentation/devicetree/writing-schema.rst.quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7d5a69e --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c.txt@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +* Device Tree Bindings for I2C PTP based Trusted Platform Module(TPM) + +The TCG defines hardware protocol, registers and interface (based +on the TPM Interface Specification) for accessing TPM devices +implemented with an I2C interface. + +Refer to the 'I2C Interface Definition' section in 'TCG PC Client +PlatformTPMProfile(PTP) Specification' publication for specification. + +Required properties: + +- compatible : Should be "tcg,tpm_tis-i2c"s/_/-/ As this has to be under an I2C controller node, the '-i2c' part is redundant.
I wrote this Respectively with the tpm_tis-spi driver. https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.txt Should i change it anyway or keep the format? Also the '-i2c' is added since its not the only protocol used over tis, and it is handled differently from spi.
There's a bigger issue that the h/w here is more than just an I2C protocol. The chip may have multiple power supplies, clocks, reset lines, etc. HID over I2C seems like a similar case. Does the spec define *all* of that? If not, you need chip specific compatibles. You can keep this as a fallback though.quoted
+- reg : Address on the bus +- tpm-pirq : Input gpio pin, used for host interruptsGPIO connections are properties ending in '-gpios'. However, if the only use is an interrupt, then you should use 'interrupts'.
My mistake, i didn't implemented interrupts yet so ill clear this for now. thank you.
quoted
+ +Example (for Raspberry Pie 3 Board with Nuvoton's NPCT75X (2.0) +------------------------------------------------------------------- + +tpm_tis-i2c: tpm_tis-i2c@2e { + + compatible = "tcg,tpm_tis-i2c"; + reg = <0x2e>; + tpm-pirq = <&gpio 24 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; +}; -- 2.7.4
Apologies for the late response, had a personal issue that needed my attention I'm working on making this a schema for next version. This is new for me, if you have additional sources regarding how to write it, i'll appreciate if you send me. Thank you. Amir Mizinski