Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 3 authors, 2019-11-18

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Split rk3399-roc-pc for with and without mezzanine board.

flat view

From: Markus Reichl <hidden>
Date: 2019-11-18 11:57:21
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-rockchip, lkml

Hi Jagan,

Am 18.11.19 um 12:44 schrieb Jagan Teki:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 5:42 PM Heiko Stübner [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi Markus,

Am Freitag, 1. November 2019, 17:54:23 CET schrieb Markus Reichl:
quoted
For rk3399-roc-pc is a mezzanine board available that carries M.2 and
POE interfaces. Use it with a separate dts.

Signed-off-by: Markus Reichl <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile         |   1 +
 .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezz.dts  |  52 ++
 .../arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dts | 757 +----------------
 .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi      | 767 ++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 821 insertions(+), 756 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezz.dts
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
index a959434ad46e..80ee9f1fc5f5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-nanopi-neo4.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-orangepi.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-puma-haikou.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc.dtb
+dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-roc-pc-mezz.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock-pi-4.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rock960.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3399-rockpro64.dtb
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezz.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezz.dts
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ee77677d2cf2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezz.dts
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2017 T-Chip Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd
+ * Copyright (c) 2019 Markus Reichl <m.reichl@fivetechno.de>
+ */
+
+/dts-v1/;
+#include "rk3399-roc-pc.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+     model = "Firefly ROC-RK3399-PC Mezzanine Board";
+     compatible = "firefly,roc-rk3399-pc", "rockchip,rk3399";
different board with same compatible isn't possible, so
you'll need a new compatible for it and add a new line to
the roc-pc entry in
        Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml

Either you see it as
- a board + hat, using dt overlay and same compatible
- a completely separate board, which needs a separate
  compatible as well

And as discussed in the previous thread
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/2019-November/027592.html
but also in Jagan's response that really is somehow a grey area
for something relatively static as the M.2 extension.
Sorry for late response on this. I still think that the "overlay would
be a better suite" than having separate dts, since it is HAT which is
optional to insert and have possibility of having another HAT if it
really fit into it.

Comments?
Presently no other extension board does exist, I don't expect one.

I use it with rootfs on NVME on the mezzanine board.
It is convenient to have the NVME up before going to user space.

The board has SPI-NOR MTD storage to host U-Boot. 
In future U-Boot could boot from NVME directly without needing
an SD or MMC to host the boot kernel.

Gruß,
-- 
Markus Reichl
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help