On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:27:15 +0200
Marco Felsch [off-list ref] wrote:

[..]

quoted

so you disagree with this pattern:
in .dtsi
 some_device {
   pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_some_device>;
 };

and in .dts (one I sent with this patch series and the tolino/mx6sl one
is not ready-cooked yet, will be part of a later series)
&iomuxc {
   pinctrl_some_device: some_devicegrp {
   	fsl,pins = <...>;
   };
};

?  

Yes, because IMHO a dtsi is self contained as well as a dts. If it is
common for all boards you can move the muxing into the dtsi else it
should be done within the dts.

well, since imx6sll-pinfunc.h is different than imx6sl-pinfunc.h,
we agree that this belongs to the dts.

quoted

quoted

quoted

+&snvs_rtc {
+	status = "disabled";    

Same applies here.
  

No, seems to be an exception, it does not have a status = "disabled" in
imx6sll.dtsi.  

Did you mean 6sll or 6ull?

Okay, is this baseboard only used with a 6ull?

MCIMX6V7DVN10AB and MCIMX6L8DVN10AB
So it is 6sll and 6sl (6sl support will be added in a follow-up patch
series). 

I will send a v2 this evening, so we can all look at better-sorted
things.

Regards,
Andreas