Thread (28 messages) 28 messages, 6 authors, 2019-10-02
STALE2476d
Revisions (6)
  1. v3 [diff vs current]
  2. v4 [diff vs current]
  3. v5 [diff vs current]
  4. v6 [diff vs current]
  5. v7 current
  6. v9 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v7 09/13] lib/vsprintf: Add a note on re-using %pf or %pF

From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2019-09-18 13:34:17
Also in: linux-acpi, lkml
Subsystem: library code, the rest, vsprintf · Maintainers: Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Petr Mladek, Steven Rostedt

Add a note warning of re-use of obsolete %pf or %pF extensions.

Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 lib/vsprintf.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
index b00b57f9f911f..df59818537b52 100644
--- a/lib/vsprintf.c
+++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
@@ -2008,6 +2008,8 @@ static char *kobject_string(char *buf, char *end, void *ptr,
  * - 'S' For symbolic direct pointers (or function descriptors) with offset
  * - 's' For symbolic direct pointers (or function descriptors) without offset
  * - '[Ss]R' as above with __builtin_extract_return_addr() translation
+ * - '[Ff]' Obsolete an now unsupported extension for printing direct pointers
+ *	    or function descriptors. Be careful when re-using %pf or %pF!
  * - 'B' For backtraced symbolic direct pointers with offset
  * - 'R' For decoded struct resource, e.g., [mem 0x0-0x1f 64bit pref]
  * - 'r' For raw struct resource, e.g., [mem 0x0-0x1f flags 0x201]
-- 
2.20.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help