Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 5 authors, 2019-10-10

Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] pinctrl: Add new pinctrl/GPIO driver

From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2019-09-13 08:18:13
Also in: linux-gpio, lkml

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 11:11:32AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
Hi Rahul,

thanks for your patches!

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 8:59 AM Rahul Tanwar
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
This series is to add pinctrl & GPIO controller driver for a new SoC.
Patch 1 adds pinmux & GPIO controller driver.
Patch 2 adds the dt bindings document & include file.

Patches are against Linux 5.3-rc5 at below Git tree:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git
OK nice, I think you need to include Mika Westerberg on this review
as well, because I think he likes to stay on top of all things intel
in pin control. (Also included two other Intel folks in Finland who usually
take an interest in these things.)
Thanks Linus for looping me in.

Even if this is not directly based on the stuff we have under
drivers/pinctrl/intel/*, I have a couple of comments. I don't have this
patch series in my inbox so I'm commenting here.

Since the driver name is equilibrium I suggest you to name
intel_pinctrl_driver and the like (probe, remove) to follow that
convention to avoid confusing this with the Intel pinctrl drivers under
drivers/pinctrl/intel/*.

Maybe use eqbr prefix so then intel_pinctrl_driver becomes
eqbr_pinctrl_driver and so on. Also all the structures like
intel_pinctrl_drv_data should be changed accordingly.

Ditto for:

MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel Pinctrl Driver for LGM SoC");

I think better would be:

MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Pinctrl Driver for LGM SoC (Equilibrium)");

Anyway you get the idea :)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help