Re: [RESEND, PATCH v13 10/12] soc: mediatek: cmdq: add polling function
From: Bibby Hsieh <hidden>
Date: 2019-08-27 04:07:46
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, lkml
On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 16:05 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
On 20/08/2019 10:49, Bibby Hsieh wrote:quoted
add polling function in cmdq helper functions Signed-off-by: Bibby Hsieh <redacted> Reviewed-by: CK Hu <redacted> --- drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h | 1 + include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h | 15 +++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c index e3d5b0be8e79..c53f8476c68d 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c@@ -221,6 +221,34 @@ int cmdq_pkt_clear_event(struct cmdq_pkt *pkt, u16 event) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(cmdq_pkt_clear_event); +int cmdq_pkt_poll(struct cmdq_pkt *pkt, u8 subsys, + u16 offset, u32 value, u32 mask) +{ + struct cmdq_instruction *inst; + + if (mask != 0xffffffff) {Is this necessary? Can't we just always set the mask, even if it's 0xffffffff? Regarding interfaces, depending on how often you expect the mask being ~0 we might think of adding a cmdq_pkt_poll_mask call. What I want to say, if in the end most of the callers will use the mask with 0xffffffff, then we should add a call cmdq_pkt_poll_mask which actually allows to set the mask and let cmdq_pkt_poll set the mask in it's function body. As I already said, this depends on how often you think a caller will use/not-use the mask. Does this make sense?
It's better to have two function: cmdq_pkt_poll_mask and cmdq_pkt_poll, client can choose which they need by themselves. Thanks for the comments. Bibby
quoted
+ inst = cmdq_pkt_append_command(pkt); + if (!inst) + return -ENOMEM; + + inst->op = CMDQ_CODE_MASK; + inst->value = ~mask; + offset = offset | 0x1; + } + + inst = cmdq_pkt_append_command(pkt); + if (!inst) + return -ENOMEM; + + inst->op = CMDQ_CODE_POLL; + inst->value = value; + inst->offset = offset; + inst->subsys = subsys; + + return 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cmdq_pkt_poll); + static int cmdq_pkt_finalize(struct cmdq_pkt *pkt) { struct cmdq_instruction *inst;diff --git a/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h b/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h index c8adedefaf42..9e3502945bc1 100644 --- a/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h +++ b/include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ enum cmdq_code { CMDQ_CODE_MASK = 0x02, CMDQ_CODE_WRITE = 0x04, + CMDQ_CODE_POLL = 0x08, CMDQ_CODE_JUMP = 0x10, CMDQ_CODE_WFE = 0x20, CMDQ_CODE_EOC = 0x40,diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h index 9618debb9ceb..a345870a6d10 100644 --- a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h +++ b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h@@ -99,6 +99,21 @@ int cmdq_pkt_wfe(struct cmdq_pkt *pkt, u16 event); */ int cmdq_pkt_clear_event(struct cmdq_pkt *pkt, u16 event); +/** + * cmdq_pkt_poll() - Append polling command to the CMDQ packet, ask GCE to + * execute an instruction that wait for a specified hardware + * register to check for the value. All GCE hardware + * threads will be blocked by this instruction. + * @pkt: the CMDQ packet + * @subsys: the CMDQ sub system code + * @offset: register offset from CMDQ sub system + * @value: the specified target register value + * @mask: the specified target register mask + * + * Return: 0 for success; else the error code is returned + */ +int cmdq_pkt_poll(struct cmdq_pkt *pkt, u8 subsys, + u16 offset, u32 value, u32 mask); /** * cmdq_pkt_flush_async() - trigger CMDQ to asynchronously execute the CMDQ * packet and call back at the end of done packet