Thread (50 messages) 50 messages, 7 authors, 2019-11-06

Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support for ls1088a and ls2088a

From: christophe leroy <hidden>
Date: 2019-08-24 06:45:40
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, linuxppc-dev, lkml


Le 24/08/2019 à 02:18, Xiaowei Bao a écrit :
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Murray <redacted>
Sent: 2019年8月23日 22:28
To: Xiaowei Bao <redacted>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com;
shawnguo@kernel.org; Leo Li [off-list ref]; kishon@ti.com;
lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.co; arnd@arndb.de; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; M.h.
Lian [off-list ref]; Mingkai Hu [off-list ref]; Roy
Zang [off-list ref]; jingoohan1@gmail.com;
gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org;
devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support for
ls1088a and ls2088a

On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 07:22:40PM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
quoted
Add PCIe EP mode support for ls1088a and ls2088a, there are some
difference between LS1 and LS2 platform, so refactor the code of the
EP driver.

Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <redacted>
---
v2:
  - New mechanism for layerscape EP driver.
Was there a v1 of this patch?
Yes, but I don't know how to comments, ^_^
As far as I can see, in the previous version of the series 
(https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=125315&state=*), 
the 8/10 was something completely different, and I can't find any other 
patch in the series that could have been the v1 of this patch.

Christophe
quoted
quoted
  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 76
++++++++++++++++++++------
  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
index 7ca5fe8..2a66f07 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
@@ -20,27 +20,29 @@

  #define PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET		0x1000	/* DBI2 base address*/

-struct ls_pcie_ep {
-	struct dw_pcie		*pci;
-	struct pci_epc_features	*ls_epc;
+#define to_ls_pcie_ep(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
+
+struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata {
+	u32				func_offset;
+	const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops	*ops;
+	const struct dw_pcie_ops	*dw_pcie_ops;
  };

-#define to_ls_pcie_ep(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
+struct ls_pcie_ep {
+	struct dw_pcie			*pci;
+	struct pci_epc_features		*ls_epc;
+	const struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata *drvdata; };

  static int ls_pcie_establish_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)  {
  	return 0;
  }

-static const struct dw_pcie_ops ls_pcie_ep_ops = {
+static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_ls_pcie_ep_ops = {
  	.start_link = ls_pcie_establish_link,  };

-static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls-pcie-ep",},
-	{ },
-};
-
  static const struct pci_epc_features*  ls_pcie_ep_get_features(struct
dw_pcie_ep *ep)  { @@ -82,10 +84,44 @@ static int
ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
  	}
  }

-static const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops pcie_ep_ops = {
+static unsigned int ls_pcie_ep_func_conf_select(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep,
+						u8 func_no)
+{
+	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
+	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
+	u8 header_type;
+
+	header_type = ioread8(pci->dbi_base + PCI_HEADER_TYPE);
+
+	if (header_type & (1 << 7))
+		return pcie->drvdata->func_offset * func_no;
+	else
+		return 0;
It looks like there isn't a PCI define for multi function, the nearest I could find
was PCI_HEADER_TYPE_MULTIDEVICE in hotplug/ibmphp.h. A comment
above the test might be helpful to explain the test.
Yes, I have not find the PCI_HEADER_TYPE_MULTIDEVICE define. OK, I will add
The comments in next version patch.
quoted
As the ls_pcie_ep_drvdata structures are static, the unset .func_offset will be
initialised to 0, so you could just drop the test above.
OK, thanks
quoted
However something to the effect of the following may help spot
misconfiguration:

WARN_ON(func_no && !pcie->drvdata->func_offset); return
pcie->drvdata->func_offset * func_no;
Thanks a lot, this looks better.
quoted
The WARN is probably quite useful as if you are attempting to use non-zero
functions and func_offset isn't set - then things may appear to work normally
but actually will break horribly.
got it, thanks.
quoted
Thanks,

Andrew Murray
quoted
+}
+
+static const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops ls_pcie_ep_ops = {
  	.ep_init = ls_pcie_ep_init,
  	.raise_irq = ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq,
  	.get_features = ls_pcie_ep_get_features,
+	.func_conf_select = ls_pcie_ep_func_conf_select, };
+
+static const struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata ls1_ep_drvdata = {
+	.ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops,
+	.dw_pcie_ops = &dw_ls_pcie_ep_ops,
+};
+
+static const struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata ls2_ep_drvdata = {
+	.func_offset = 0x20000,
+	.ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops,
+	.dw_pcie_ops = &dw_ls_pcie_ep_ops,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls1_ep_drvdata },
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1088a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls2_ep_drvdata },
+	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2088a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls2_ep_drvdata },
+	{ },
  };

  static int __init ls_add_pcie_ep(struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie, @@ -98,7
+134,7 @@ static int __init ls_add_pcie_ep(struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie,
  	int ret;

  	ep = &pci->ep;
-	ep->ops = &pcie_ep_ops;
+	ep->ops = pcie->drvdata->ops;

  	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
"addr_space");
quoted
  	if (!res)
@@ -137,14 +173,11 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct
platform_device *pdev)
quoted
  	if (!ls_epc)
  		return -ENOMEM;

-	dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
"regs");
quoted
-	pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
-	if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
-		return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base);
+	pcie->drvdata = of_device_get_match_data(dev);

-	pci->dbi_base2 = pci->dbi_base + PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET;
  	pci->dev = dev;
-	pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops;
+	pci->ops = pcie->drvdata->dw_pcie_ops;
+
  	pcie->pci = pci;

  	ls_epc->linkup_notifier = false,
@@ -152,6 +185,13 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct
platform_device *pdev)

  	pcie->ls_epc = ls_epc;

+	dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
"regs");
quoted
+	pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
+	if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
+		return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base);
+
+	pci->dbi_base2 = pci->dbi_base + PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET;
+
  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);

  	ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev);
--
2.9.5
---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help