Am 23. August 2019 16:56:13 MESZ schrieb Matthias Brugger [off-list ref]:

are you sure that you provide the correct chip_id here? I saw 0x2023
(if I
remember correctly), while this switch checks for 0x23, 0x91 and 0x97,
so I'm
not sure if the problem really lies here. I didn't dig into the code to
find out
how the chip_id is created.

The chip-id 0x2023 is reported with 5.3-rc5, next-code says 0x0. So i guess the chipid is read out/calculated the wrong way. If calculation is not changed the read is changed compared to 5.3