Re: [PATCH v9 20/22] soc/tegra: pmc: Configure deep sleep control settings
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Date: 2019-08-19 19:33:58
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-gpio, linux-pm, linux-tegra, lkml
19.08.2019 22:07, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
On 8/19/19 11:20 AM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:quoted
On 8/19/19 9:48 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:quoted
16.08.2019 22:42, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:quoted
Tegra210 and prior Tegra chips have deep sleep entry and wakeup related timings which are platform specific that should be configured before entering into deep sleep. Below are the timing specific configurations for deep sleep entry and wakeup. - Core rail power-on stabilization timer - OSC clock stabilization timer after SOC rail power is stabilized. - Core power off time is the minimum wake delay to keep the system in deep sleep state irrespective of any quick wake event. These values depends on the discharge time of regulators and turn OFF time of the PMIC to allow the complete system to finish entering into deep sleep state. These values vary based on the platform design and are specified through the device tree. This patch has implementation to configure these timings which are must to have for proper deep sleep and wakeup operations. Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com> --- drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c index 53ed70773872..710969043668 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c@@ -88,6 +88,8 @@#define PMC_CPUPWRGOOD_TIMER 0xc8 #define PMC_CPUPWROFF_TIMER 0xcc +#define PMC_COREPWRGOOD_TIMER 0x3c +#define PMC_COREPWROFF_TIMER 0xe0 #define PMC_PWR_DET_VALUE 0xe4 @@ -2277,7 +2279,7 @@ static const struct tegra_pmc_regs tegra20_pmc_regs = { static void tegra20_pmc_init(struct tegra_pmc *pmc) { - u32 value; + u32 value, osc, pmu, off; /* Always enable CPU power request */ value = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, PMC_CNTRL);@@ -2303,6 +2305,16 @@ static void tegra20_pmc_init(struct tegra_pmc*pmc) value = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, PMC_CNTRL); value |= PMC_CNTRL_SYSCLK_OE; tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, value, PMC_CNTRL); + + /* program core timings which are applicable only for suspend state */ + if (pmc->suspend_mode != TEGRA_SUSPEND_NONE) { + osc = DIV_ROUND_UP(pmc->core_osc_time * 8192, 1000000); + pmu = DIV_ROUND_UP(pmc->core_pmu_time * 32768, 1000000); + off = DIV_ROUND_UP(pmc->core_off_time * 32768, 1000000); + tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, ((osc << 8) & 0xff00) | (pmu & 0xff), + PMC_COREPWRGOOD_TIMER); + tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, off, PMC_COREPWROFF_TIMER); + } } static void tegra20_pmc_setup_irq_polarity(struct tegra_pmc *pmc,In the previous version of this patch there were checks for zero values of the timers with intention to skip programming of the timers if value is zero. I'm a bit puzzled by the new version, given that SUSPEND_NONE means that suspending isn't available at all and thus PMC timers won't be utilized, hence it shouldn't matter what values are programmed for the counters, isn't it?Yes, as I see in documentation we already specify all these timings are required properties when suspend mode is used, I updated in this version to program core timings only when suspend mode is enabled.In other words, core timings are for SC7 entry only. So when SC7/suspend mode is not used, these timings doesn't matter.
In this case, it should be a bit more straightforward to always program the timers unconditionally. But since device-tree binding requires all the properties to be specified when suspend mode isn't NONE, then the new variant also makes sense. Either way is good to me, thanks. Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>