RE: [PATCH 2/2] media: v4l: xilinx: Add Xilinx UHD-SDI Rx Subsystem driver
From: Vishal Sagar <hidden>
Date: 2019-06-18 12:45:18
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-media, lkml
Hi Hans,
-----Original Message----- From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverkuil@xs4all.nl] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 5:38 PM To: Vishal Sagar <redacted> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- kernel@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; Dinesh Kumar [off-list ref]; Sandip Kothari [off-list ref]; Vishal Sagar [off-list ref]; Hyun Kwon [off-list ref]; Laurent Pinchart [off-list ref]; Mauro Carvalho Chehab [off-list ref]; Michal Simek [off-list ref]; Rob Herring [off-list ref]; Mark Rutland [off-list ref]; Sakari Ailus [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] media: v4l: xilinx: Add Xilinx UHD-SDI Rx Subsystem driver On 6/18/19 1:51 PM, Vishal Sagar wrote:quoted
Hi Hans,quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverkuil@xs4all.nl] Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2019 1:25 PM To: Vishal Sagar <redacted> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- kernel@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; Dinesh Kumar [off-list ref]; Sandip Kothari [off-list ref]; Vishal Sagar [off-list ref]; Hyun Kwon [off-list ref]; LaurentPinchartquoted
quoted
[off-list ref]; Mauro Carvalho Chehab [off-list ref]; Michal Simek [off-list ref]; Rob Herring [off-list ref]; Mark Rutland [off-list ref]; SakariAilusquoted
quoted
[off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] media: v4l: xilinx: Add Xilinx UHD-SDI Rx Subsystem driver On 6/14/19 1:44 PM, Vishal Sagar wrote:quoted
Hi Hans, Thanks for reviewing this patch.quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverkuil@xs4all.nl] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2019 6:28 PM To: Vishal Sagar <redacted>; Hyun Kwon[off-list ref];quoted
quoted
Laurent Pinchart [off-list ref]; Mauro Carvalho Chehab [off-list ref]; Michal Simek [off-list ref];Robquoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Herring [off-list ref]; Mark Rutland [off-list ref] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- kernel@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; Dinesh Kumar [off-list ref]; Sandip Kothari [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] media: v4l: xilinx: Add Xilinx UHD-SDI RxSubsystemquoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
driver EXTERNAL EMAIL On 6/4/19 3:55 PM, Vishal Sagar wrote:quoted
The Xilinx UHD-SDI Rx subsystem soft IP is used to capture native SDI streams from SDI sources like SDI broadcast equipment like cameras and mixers. This block outputs either native SDI, native video or AXI4-Stream compliant data stream for further processing. Please refer to PG290 for details. The driver is used to configure the IP to add framer, search for specific modes, get the detected mode, stream parameters, errors, etc. It also generates events for video lock/unlock, bridge over/under flow. The driver supports only 10 bpc YUV 422 media bus format. It also decodes the stream parameters based on the ST352 packet embedded inthequoted
quoted
quoted
stream. In case the ST352 packet isn't present in the stream, the core's detected properties are used to set stream properties. The driver currently supports only the AXI4-Stream configuration. Signed-off-by: Vishal Sagar <redacted> --- drivers/media/platform/xilinx/Kconfig | 11 + drivers/media/platform/xilinx/Makefile | 1 + drivers/media/platform/xilinx/xilinx-sdirxss.c | 1846++++++++++++++++++++++++quoted
include/uapi/linux/xilinx-sdirxss.h | 63 + include/uapi/linux/xilinx-v4l2-controls.h | 30 + include/uapi/linux/xilinx-v4l2-events.h | 9 +<snip>quoted
quoted
I am concerned about this driver: I see that none of the *_dv_timingscallbacksquoted
quoted
are implemented. I would expect to see that for a video receiver. There isalsoquoted
quoted
no g_input_status implemented. Take a look at another SDI driver: drivers/media/spi/gs1662.cI had a look at the gs1662 driver for the dv_timings callbacks. The gs1662driverquoted
requires the timings because it is a SDI Transmitter. Here the timings are not required as the IP block generates a AXI4 Stream. I think it may be required only in case of native / parallel video beingoutputtedquoted
as the output stream needs timing information to be decoded. Please feel free to correct my understanding if wrong. In the current driver, the input stream properties like width, height, framerate,quoted
progressive/interlaced are determined from the ST352 packet payload orfrom thequoted
properties detected by the core. See the xsdirx_get_stream_properties() for details.You're wrong. In xsdirx_get_stream_properties() you set the format information. But you can't just change that: if the video resolution changes, then thatmeansquoted
quoted
that userspace needs to be informed that it has changed at the source, it hastoquoted
quoted
find and set the new timings, update the formats, possibly reallocatememoryquoted
quoted
for the buffers, update other parts of the video pipeline with the new resolution etc. The one thing you cannot do is just pass on the new resolution and hopethatquoted
quoted
the video pipeline can handle it all. The right sequence of events is: 1) When a change is detected at the source the driver sends the SOURCE_CHANGE event and either stops transmitting to the video pipeline or keeps sendingthequoted
quoted
old resolution (some devices have a freewheeling mode where they can do that). 2) Userspace sees the event, calls QUERY_DV_TIMINGS to find a new timings(ifquoted
quoted
any), usually stops streaming, and calls S_DV_TIMINGS to set the detected timings: at that point the driver can configure the output towards the video pipeline with the new timings. Userspace reallocates buffers and resumes streaming withthequoted
quoted
new resolution.Thanks for the explanation! I will remove the extraneous video unlock event and stop the streaming whenvideo lock / unlock interrupt occurs.quoted
I will also implement the g_input_status() to return V4L2_IN_ST_NO_SYNC |V4L2_IN_ST_NO_SIGNAL in case video is unlocked.quoted
My assumption is that on SOURCE_CHANGE event, application can stop thepipeline and thenquoted
call the G_FORMAT and G_FRAME_INTERVAL to get new frame size, type(progressive / interlaced) and frame rate.quoted
Is this assumption correct?No :-)
Good to have that cleared. :-D
After SOURCE_CHANGE is received an application calls QUERY_DV_TIMINGS. If that returns valid timings, then the application calls S_DV_TIMINGS with the detected timings. The driver will now update the format, frame interval, etc. according to the new timings. And the application can use that to reconfigure the video pipeline.quoted
Is it mandatory to implement QUERY_DV_TIMINGS with SOURCE_CHANGEevent? Yes.
Thanks again for clarifying this.
quoted
I also don't see any V4L2 framework supported events for overflow andunderflow.quoted
Is it ok to keep these or should they be removed too?under/overflow of what? Internal fifos? You can keep the custom events for that.
Yep these are custom events for internal fifos. I will keep them. Regards Vishal Sagar
Regards, Hansquoted
Regards Vishal Sagarquoted
Note that G_DV_TIMINGS returns the last configured timings, not thedetectedquoted
quoted
timings: only QUERY_DV_TIMINGS does that. In other words: userspace has to retain control of the full pipeline. Regards, Hansquoted
quoted
Some of the controls you add in this driver can likely be dropped.Especiallyquoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
those controls that are not specific to the Xilinx implementation but are generic for any SDI receiver, should be looked at closely: those are candidates for becoming standard controls.I don't know how other SDI Receiver devices function. So I am assuming all these controls are Xilinx specific implementations.quoted
But the documentation above is simply insufficient for me to tell what is SDI specific and what is implementation specific.I will add more documentation for these controls.quoted
Also, I'm no SDI expert, certainly not for the UHD-SDI. Regards, HansRegards Vishal Sagar