Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] memory: tegra20-emc: Replace clk_get_sys with devm_clk_get
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Date: 2019-06-17 15:01:38
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-tegra, lkml
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Date: 2019-06-17 15:01:38
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-tegra, lkml
17.06.2019 12:46, Thierry Reding пишет:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 02:35:46AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:quoted
There is no problem for drivers to request pll_m and pll_p clocks for the device, hence there is no need to use clk_get_sys() and it could be replaced with devm_clk_get() for consistency. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> --- drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c | 12 ++++-------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c index 43aef3614b65..527aa4b90e95 100644 --- a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c +++ b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c@@ -527,33 +527,29 @@ static int tegra_emc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto unset_cb; } - emc->pll_m = clk_get_sys(NULL, "pll_m"); + emc->pll_m = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pll_m");Interesting... I didn't know that clk_get() had a fallback path to return clk_get_sys() if the named clock wasn't found in DT. That's nice. Looks good to me.
Yes, I didn't know either until recently. Thanks!