From: Linus Walleij [mailto:linus.walleij@linaro.org]
Sent: Saturday, June 8, 2019 5:04 AM
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:04 AM [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: Anson Huang <redacted>
Add binding doc for i.MX8MN pinctrl driver.
Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <redacted>
Looks mostly OK to me, but I'd like the maintainers to review, so Dong et al
please look at this!
quoted
+Required properties:
+- compatible: "fsl,imx8mn-iomuxc"
So should this not be "nxp,imx8mn-iomuxc"
or "nxp,freescale-imx8mn-iomuxc" or something these days? The vendor name
is nxp is it not.
I was complaining to the DT maintainers at one point that these companies
seem to buy each other left and right so this vendor nomenclature is dubious,
but I guess at least it should reflect the vendor that produced the chip or
something.
If everyone is happy with "fsl,*" I will not complain though.
(i.e. if the maintainers ACK it.)
We preferred to keep "fsl,*" for Freescale i.MX product line according to last discussion.
And we already did this way for most i.MX devices.
So:
Acked-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
(Rob, please let us know if you have different idea)
Regards
Dong Aisheng
Yours,
Linus Walleij