Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
From: Amelie DELAUNAY <hidden>
Date: 2019-02-28 14:59:46
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-gpio, lkml
From: Amelie DELAUNAY <hidden>
Date: 2019-02-28 14:59:46
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-gpio, lkml
On 2/28/19 3:41 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:54 AM Amelie DELAUNAY [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:quoted
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:quoted
This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core. Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <redacted> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <redacted> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones [off-list ref] --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txtPlease add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is identical to v3. I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter. Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?No, as the series should be applied together. You just need to add the Reviewed-by so I can ignore it. Rob
Noted. I will ensure not to forget any tag next time. Regards, Amelie