Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] clk: qcom: Add MSM8998 Multimedia Clock Controller (MMCC) driver
From: Jeffrey Hugo <hidden>
Date: 2019-02-05 22:12:08
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, lkml
On 2/5/2019 3:06 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Jeffrey Hugo (2019-01-30 08:36:11) [..]quoted
+}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mmcc_msm8998_match_table); + +static int mmcc_msm8998_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + int i, ret; + struct regmap *regmap; + struct clk *c; + + c = devm_clk_get(dev, "xo"); + if (!IS_ERR(c)) + dummy_xo_init.parent_names = + (const char *[]){__clk_get_name(c)}; + else + return PTR_ERR(c); + + c = devm_clk_get(dev, "gpll0"); + if (!IS_ERR(c)) + dummy_gpll0_init.parent_names = + (const char *[]){__clk_get_name(c)}; + else + return PTR_ERR(c);Urgh, my parent mapping series can't come be merged fast enough it seems!
Sorry, I'm not familiar with the context. Something I should incorporate?
quoted
+ + regmap = qcom_cc_map(pdev, &mmcc_msm8998_desc); + if (IS_ERR(regmap)) + return PTR_ERR(regmap); + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mmcc_msm8998_hws); i++) { + ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, mmcc_msm8998_hws[i]);I think we should make this common to the qcom_cc_desc now. Can you throw in an optional list of clk_hw pointers that also get registered as its own patch and update the existing drivers that are all doing this?
Yeah, can do.
quoted
+ if (ret) + return ret; + } + + return qcom_cc_really_probe(pdev, &mmcc_msm8998_desc, regmap); +}
-- Jeffrey Hugo Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.