Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: gta04: add gps support
flat view
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Date: 2019-01-30 09:02:43
Also in:
linux-omap, lkml
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 05:44:29PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:53:56 +0100 Johan Hovold [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 08:43:10PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:quoted
The GTA04 has a w2sg0004 or w2sg0084 gps chip. Not detectable which one is mounted so use the compatibility entry for w2sg0004 for all which will work for both. Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> --- w2sg0004 bindings (together with the corresponding support is in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/johan/gnss gnss-next) arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
quoted
quoted
+ gps: gps {The node should be named "gnss" as per the binding.quoted
+ compatible = "wi2wi,w2sg0004"; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&gps_pins>; + sirf,onoff-gpios = <&gpio5 17 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + lna-supply = <&vsim>;Also, the vcc-supply is a required property.well, it is not require in the driver and it has different behavior (on even when not opened if on-off is there) than the lna-supply used here. So maybe fix the binding documentation?
The device-tree describes hardware, and how a particular driver happens to implement a binding is not relevant. That said, there is a bit of an on-going, shall we say philosophical, debate about this. The regulator maintainer takes a firm position that all mandatory physical supplies should be represented in firmware https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181123133126.GF2089@sirena.org.uk/T/#u (local) https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180409102244.GB11532@sirena.org.uk/T/#u (local) while Rob appears to take a slightly different stance on fixed regulators while admitting that this an issue which has not yet been fully resolved: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180425171123.xhyoay3nu463btoq@rob-hp-laptop/T/#u (local) Since this is a new binding, and the hardware requires the vcc supply and this is reflected in the binding, I think you should add a fixed regulator. At least until you hear otherwise. ;) Johan