Re: [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sdhci_am654: Add Initial Support for AM654 SDHCI driver
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Date: 2018-12-07 13:33:46
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mmc, lkml
On 5/12/18 5:07 PM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
Hi Adrian, On 05/12/18 7:12 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:quoted
On 29/11/18 6:15 PM, Faiz Abbas wrote:quoted
The host controllers on TI's AM654 SOCs are not compatible with the phy and consumer model of the sdhci-of-arasan driver. It turns out that for optimal operation at higher speeds, a special tuning procedure needs to be implemented which involves configuration of platform specific phy registers. Therefore, branch out to a new sdhci_am654 driver and add the phy register space with all phy configurations to it. Populate AM654 specific callbacks to sdhci_ops and add SDHCI_QUIRKS wherever applicable. Only add support for upto High Speed for SD card and upto DDR52 speed mode for eMMC. Higher speeds will be added in subsequent patches....quoted
quoted
+ sdhci_am654->dll_on = true; + } +} + +Double blank lineWill fix.quoted
quoted
+static void sdhci_am654_set_power(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned char mode, + unsigned short vdd) +{ + if (!IS_ERR(host->mmc->supply.vmmc)) { + struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc; + + mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, mmc->supply.vmmc, vdd); + } + sdhci_set_power_noreg(host, mode, vdd); +} + +struct sdhci_ops sdhci_am654_ops = { + .get_max_clock = sdhci_pltfm_clk_get_max_clock, + .get_timeout_clock = sdhci_pltfm_clk_get_max_clock, + .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling, + .set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width, + .set_power = sdhci_am654_set_power, + .set_clock = sdhci_am654_set_clock, + .reset = sdhci_reset, +}; + +static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_am654_pdata = { + .ops = &sdhci_am654_ops, + .quirks = SDHCI_QUIRK_INVERTED_WRITE_PROTECT | + SDHCI_QUIRK_MULTIBLOCK_READ_ACMD12, + .quirks2 = SDHCI_QUIRK2_PRESET_VALUE_BROKEN, +}; + +static int sdhci_am654_init(struct sdhci_host *host) +{ + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); + struct sdhci_am654_data *sdhci_am654 = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); + u32 ctl_cfg_2 = 0; + u32 val; + int ret; + + regmap_read(sdhci_am654->base, PHY_STAT1, &val); + if (~val & CALDONE_MASK) { + /* Calibrate IO lines */ + regmap_update_bits(sdhci_am654->base, PHY_CTRL1, + PDB_MASK, PDB_MASK); + ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(sdhci_am654->base, PHY_STAT1, + val, val & CALDONE_MASK, 1, 20); + if (ret) + return ret; + } + + /* Enable pins by setting IO mux to 0 */ + regmap_update_bits(sdhci_am654->base, PHY_CTRL1, + IOMUX_ENABLE_MASK, 0); + + /* Set slot type based on SD or eMMC */ + if (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) + ctl_cfg_2 = SLOTTYPE_EMBEDDED; + + regmap_update_bits(sdhci_am654->base, CTL_CFG_2, + ctl_cfg_2, SLOTTYPE_MASK); + + return sdhci_add_host(host); +} + +static int sdhci_am654_get_of_property(struct platform_device *pdev, + struct sdhci_am654_data *sdhci_am654) +{ + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + int drv_strength; + int ret; + + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "ti,trm-icp", + &sdhci_am654->trm_icp); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "ti,otap-del-sel", + &sdhci_am654->otap_del_sel); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "ti,driver-strength-ohm", + &drv_strength); + if (ret) + return ret; + + switch (drv_strength) { + case 50: + sdhci_am654->drv_strength = DRIVER_STRENGTH_50_OHM; + break; + case 33: + sdhci_am654->drv_strength = DRIVER_STRENGTH_33_OHM; + break; + case 66: + sdhci_am654->drv_strength = DRIVER_STRENGTH_66_OHM; + break; + case 100: + sdhci_am654->drv_strength = DRIVER_STRENGTH_100_OHM; + break; + case 40: + sdhci_am654->drv_strength = DRIVER_STRENGTH_40_OHM; + break; + default: + dev_err(dev, "Invalid driver strength\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + sdhci_get_of_property(pdev); + + return 0; +} + +static int sdhci_am654_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host; + struct sdhci_am654_data *sdhci_am654; + struct sdhci_host *host; + struct resource *res; + struct clk *clk_xin; + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + void __iomem *base; + int ret; + + host = sdhci_pltfm_init(pdev, &sdhci_am654_pdata, sizeof(*sdhci_am654)); + if (IS_ERR(host)) + return PTR_ERR(host); + + pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); + sdhci_am654 = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); + + clk_xin = devm_clk_get(dev, "clk_xin"); + if (IS_ERR(clk_xin)) { + dev_err(dev, "clk_xin clock not found.\n"); + ret = PTR_ERR(clk_xin); + goto err_pltfm_free; + } + + sdhci_am654->clk_ahb = devm_clk_get(dev, "clk_ahb"); + if (IS_ERR(sdhci_am654->clk_ahb)) { + dev_err(dev, "clk_ahb clock not found.\n"); + ret = PTR_ERR(sdhci_am654->clk_ahb); + goto err_pltfm_free; + }Did you intend not to enable clks?Yes. Clocks get enabled as a part of pm_runtime calls.
Ok, but that could use an explanatory comment. Also why get a reference to clk_ahb if that reference is never used?
quoted
quoted
+ + pltfm_host->clk = clk_xin; + + pm_runtime_enable(dev); + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); + if (ret > 0) {Did you intend 'ret > 0'?Sorry. That was intended to be < 0. Thanks, Faiz