Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] devfreq: add devfreq_suspend/resume() functions
From: Lukasz Luba <hidden>
Date: 2018-12-04 09:44:56
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
Hi Chanwoo, On 12/4/18 7:19 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Hi Lukasz, On 2018년 12월 03일 23:31, Lukasz Luba wrote:quoted
This patch adds implementation for global suspend/resume for devfreq framework. System suspend will next use these functions. The patch is based on earlier work by Tobias Jakobi.Please remove it from each patch description.
OK
quoted
Suggested-by: Tobias Jakobi <redacted> Suggested-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <redacted> --- drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/devfreq.h | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c index 36bed24..7d60423 100644 --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c@@ -935,6 +935,48 @@ int devfreq_resume_device(struct devfreq *devfreq) EXPORT_SYMBOL(devfreq_resume_device); /** + * devfreq_suspend() - Suspend devfreq governors and devices + * + * Called during system wide Suspend/Hibernate cycles for suspending governors + * and devices preserving the state for resume. On some platforms the devfreq + * device must have precise state (frequency) after resume in order to provide + * fully operating setup. + */ +void devfreq_suspend(void) +{ + struct devfreq *devfreq; + int ret; + + mutex_lock(&devfreq_list_lock); + list_for_each_entry(devfreq, &devfreq_list, node) { + ret = devfreq_suspend_device(devfreq); + if (ret) + dev_warn(&devfreq->dev, "device suspend failed\n");When I checked the cpufreq_suspend(), cpufreq_suspend() prints message as 'err' level. I think that dev_err is more proper than dev_warn. I'm not sure what is more correct log. But, 'devfreq->dev' device has the separate suspend/resume function. So, I think that devfreq_suspend() should print error log containing that it is error by devfreq framework. "device suspend failed" -> "failed to suspend devfreq device"
OK, changed in next v3 patch set.
quoted
+ } + mutex_unlock(&devfreq_list_lock); +} + +/** + * devfreq_resume() - Resume devfreq governors and devices + * + * Called during system wide Suspend/Hibernate cycle for resuming governors and + * devices that are suspended with devfreq_suspend(). + */ +void devfreq_resume(void) +{ + struct devfreq *devfreq; + int ret; + + mutex_lock(&devfreq_list_lock); + list_for_each_entry(devfreq, &devfreq_list, node) { + ret = devfreq_resume_device(devfreq); + if (ret) + dev_warn(&devfreq->dev, "device resume failed\n");ditto. "device resume failed" -> "failed to resume devfreq device"
ACK Regards, Lukasz
quoted
+ } + mutex_unlock(&devfreq_list_lock); +} + +/** * devfreq_add_governor() - Add devfreq governor * @governor: the devfreq governor to be added */diff --git a/include/linux/devfreq.h b/include/linux/devfreq.h index d985199..fbffa74 100644 --- a/include/linux/devfreq.h +++ b/include/linux/devfreq.h@@ -205,6 +205,9 @@ extern void devm_devfreq_remove_device(struct device *dev, extern int devfreq_suspend_device(struct devfreq *devfreq); extern int devfreq_resume_device(struct devfreq *devfreq); +extern void devfreq_suspend(void); +extern void devfreq_resume(void); + /** * update_devfreq() - Reevaluate the device and configure frequency * @devfreq: the devfreq device@@ -331,6 +334,9 @@ static inline int devfreq_resume_device(struct devfreq *devfreq) return 0; } +static inline void devfreq_suspend(void) {} +static inline void devfreq_resume(void) {} + static inline struct dev_pm_opp *devfreq_recommended_opp(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq, u32 flags) {