Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] treewide: add vibrator support for various MSM SOCs

[PATCH v2 0/3] treewide: add vibrator support for various MSM SOCs · Brian Masney <hidden> · 2018-09-26
[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: msm-vibrator: new bindings for MSM vibrator PWM · Brian Masney <hidden> · 2018-09-26
[PATCH v2 2/3] pwm: msm-vibrator: new driver for the vibrator found on various MSM SOCs · Brian Masney <hidden> · 2018-09-26
[PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974-hammerhead: add device tree bindings for vibrator · Brian Masney <hidden> · 2018-09-26
Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] treewide: add vibrator support for various MSM SOCs · Thierry Reding <hidden> · 2018-10-12
Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] treewide: add vibrator support for various MSM SOCs · Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> · 2018-10-16

From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: 2018-10-16 00:52:52
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-pwm, lkml

Quoting Brian Masney (2018-09-26 16:51:09)

This patch set adds support for the vibrator found on various Qualcomm
MSM SOCs. This is based on work from:

Can you please stop adding 'treewide:' to your cover letters? It is very
confusing while reading over subject summaries to see something that
isn't actually treewide end up being qcom specific.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help