Hi Heiko,
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 07:22:26PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
Am Montag, 10. September 2018, 17:13:54 CEST schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam:
quoted
Add devicetree binding for Rock960 board from Vamrs Limited.
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <redacted>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt
index acfd3c773dd0..aaad9e2ff9a3 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt
@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ Rockchip platforms device tree bindings
Required root node properties:
- compatible = "vamrs,ficus", "rockchip,rk3399";
+- 96boards RK3399 Rock960 (ROCK960 Consumer Edition)
+ Required root node properties:
+ - compatible = "vamrs,rk3399-rock960", "rockchip,rk3399";
hmm, are there more boards labeled rock960 from Vamrs?
Because I'm trying to determine what makes "vamrs,rock960" unsuitable.
Not that I'm aware of but the intention was to follow other RK3399 based
boards. Anyhow, I have no issues with "vamrs,rock960" if you prefer it!
Thanks,
Mani
Heiko