On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 1:06 AM Frank Rowand [off-list ref] wrote:

On 08/23/18 03:33, Linus Walleij wrote:

quoted

- Some indication that binding the connector like this will
  not implicate or screw things up for the DT-overlays
  idea, i.e. a both/and and not either/or approach.

(...)

For the moment, NACK since there is not a substantive change
from before.  This is without having read beyond this
introduction.

So I guess you disagree with the previous statement, and
I need some elaboration to understand exactly what in this
approach works counter to the goals of DT overlays.

It's not like I'm overly infatuated with my own approach, but
I want to get to a point where people can start to use these
daughterboards no matter whether they use DT or ACPI.

I'm missing ACPI input though, the DT people are more
responsive :/

I will read through the rest of the series and revisit my
previous conclusions, but most likely not for a few days.

OK no problem there is no immediate hurry.

Yours,
Linus Walleij