Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] mailbox: Add support for i.MX messaging unit
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Date: 2018-08-02 09:47:03
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel
Hi Vladimir, thank you for review. Jassi, Dong, any other comments? If no, i'll send tomorrow updated version. On 02.08.2018 09:54, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
Hi Oleksij, two more nitpickings fro my side. On 08/02/2018 10:23 AM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:quoted
The i.MX Messaging Unit is a two side block which allows applications implement communication over this sides. The MU includes the following features: - Messaging control by interrupts or by polling - Four general-purpose interrupt requests reflected to the other side - Three general-purpose flags reflected to the other side - Four receive registers with maskable interrupt - Four transmit registers with maskable interrupt Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com> Reviewed-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>[snip]quoted
+static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p) +{ + struct mbox_chan *chan = p; + struct imx_mu_priv *priv = to_imx_mu_priv(chan->mbox); + struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp = chan->con_priv; + u32 val, ctrl, dat; + + ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xCR); + val = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xSR); + + switch (cp->type) { + case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX: + val &= IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(cp->idx) & + (ctrl & IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx)); + break; + case IMX_MU_TYPE_RX: + val &= IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(cp->idx) & + (ctrl & IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(cp->idx)); + break; + case IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB: + val &= IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx) & + (ctrl & IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(cp->idx)); + break; + default: + break; + } + + if (!val) { + return IRQ_NONE; + } else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(cp->idx)) {Please drop the 'else' branch above. Here you can either just start from a new 'if', or all together drop 'if (!val)' and return IRQ_NONE at the end of the if-else construction.quoted
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx)); + mbox_chan_txdone(chan, 0); + } else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(cp->idx)) { + dat = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xRRn(cp->idx)); + mbox_chan_received_data(chan, (void *)&dat); + } else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx)) { + imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx), IMX_MU_xSR); + mbox_chan_received_data(chan, NULL); + } else { + dev_warn_ratelimited(priv->dev, "Not handled interrupt\n"); + return IRQ_NONE; + } + + return IRQ_HANDLED; +}[snip]quoted
+ for (i = 0; i < IMX_MU_CHANS; i++) { + struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp = &priv->con_priv[i]; + + cp->idx = i % 4; + cp->type = (i - cp->idx) >> 2;cp->type = i >> 2;quoted
+ cp->chan = &priv->mbox_chans[i]; + priv->mbox_chans[i].con_priv = cp; + snprintf(cp->irq_desc, sizeof(cp->irq_desc), + "imx_mu_chan[%i-%i]", cp->type, cp->idx); + } + + priv->side_b = of_property_read_bool(np, "fsl,mu-side-b"); + + spin_lock_init(&priv->xcr_lock); + + priv->mbox.dev = dev; + priv->mbox.ops = &imx_mu_ops; + priv->mbox.chans = priv->mbox_chans; + priv->mbox.num_chans = IMX_MU_CHANS; + priv->mbox.of_xlate = imx_mu_xlate; + priv->mbox.txdone_irq = true; + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv); + + imx_mu_init_generic(priv); + + return mbox_controller_register(&priv->mbox); +}-- Best wishes, Vladimir