(Adding arm-soc folks)

On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 9:01 PM, Sudeep Holla [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Amit,

Thanks for fixing this.

On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:23:29PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:

quoted

The idle-states binding documentation[1] mentions that the
'entry-method' property is required on 64-bit platforms and must be
set to "psci".

commit a13f18f59d26 ("Documentation: arm: Fix typo in the idle-states
bindings examples") attempted to fix this earlier but clearly more is
needed.

In fact, I assumed I fixed things with commit 978fa436231a ("drivers:
firmware: psci: unify enable-method binding on ARM {64,32}-bit systems"),
but I was wrong. I left quite a few instances including juno dtbs.

quoted

Fix the cpu-capacity.txt documentation that uses the incorrect value so
we don't get copy-paste errors like these. Clarify the language in
idle-states.txt by removing the reference to the psci bindings that
might be causing this confusion.

Finally, fix devicetrees of various boards to reflect current
documentation.

[1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt (see
idle-states node)

Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpu-capacity.txt | 2 +-
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt  | 4 ++--
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-r1.dts                    | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-r2.dts                    | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno.dts                       | 2 +-

For all the above files,

Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <redacted>

Thanks for reviewing, Sudeep.

How do you plan to merge ? I prefer if you can send it via arm-soc as
fixes for this cycle with all the necessary acks. Otherwise you may have
to split this to send via platform maintainers which is bit mundane.

I was hoping to get this merged thru arm-soc tree instead of creating
a patch per platform. But if anybody feels strongly about it, I'm
happy to split them up and feed it through the platform maintainer
trees.

Regards,
Amit