Re: [PATCH net-next 10/10] net: mscc: ocelot: make use of SerDes PHYs for handling their configuration
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2018-07-30 13:50:30
Also in:
linux-mips, lkml, netdev
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2018-07-30 13:50:30
Also in:
linux-mips, lkml, netdev
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 02:43:55PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
+ err = of_get_phy_mode(portnp); + if (err < 0) + ocelot->ports[port]->phy_mode = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA; + else + ocelot->ports[port]->phy_mode = err; + + if (ocelot->ports[port]->phy_mode == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA) + continue; + + if (ocelot->ports[port]->phy_mode == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII) + phy_mode = PHY_MODE_SGMII; + else + phy_mode = PHY_MODE_QSGMII;
Hi Quentin Say somebody puts RGMII as the phy-mode? It would be better to verify it is only SGMII or QSGMII and return -EINVAL otherwise.
+
+ serdes = devm_of_phy_get(ocelot->dev, portnp, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(serdes)) {
+ if (PTR_ERR(serdes) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
+ dev_err(ocelot->dev, "deferring probe\n");dev_dbg() ? It is not really an error.
+ err = -EPROBE_DEFER; + goto err_probe_ports; + } + + dev_err(ocelot->dev, "missing SerDes phys for port%d\n", + port); + err = -ENODEV;
err = PTR_ERR(serdes) so we get the actual error?
goto err_probe_ports; } + + ocelot->ports[port]->serdes = serdes; } register_netdevice_notifier(&ocelot_netdevice_nb);
Andrew