Re: [PATCH 1/3] i3c: master: Add driver for Synopsys DesignWare IP
From: Andy Shevchenko <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-21 15:35:38
Also in:
linux-doc, linux-gpio, linux-i2c, lkml
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:57 PM, Vitor soares [off-list ref] wrote:
This patch add driver for Synopsys DesignWare IP on top of I3C subsystem patchset proposal V6
Some of comments below related to style. But unaligned helpers I think is good to use.
+#include <linux/bitops.h> +#include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/completion.h> +#include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/errno.h> +#include <linux/i3c/master.h> +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> +#include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/ioport.h> +#include <linux/iopoll.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/reset.h>
All of them required? Why?
+ default:
Just return false here?
+ break; + } + + return false;
+ for (i = 0; i < nbytes; i += 4) {
+ u32 data = 0;
++ for (j = 0; j < 4 && (i + j) < nbytes; j++) + data |= (u32)bytes[i + j] << (j * 8);
NIH of get_unaligned_le32()
+
+ writel(data, master->regs + RX_TX_DATA_PORT);
+ }
+}
+
+static void dw_i3c_master_read_rx_fifo(struct dw_i3c_master *master,
+ u8 *bytes, int nbytes)
+{
+ int i, j;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nbytes; i += 4) {
+ u32 data;
+
+ data = readl(master->regs + RX_TX_DATA_PORT);
++ for (j = 0; j < 4 && (i + j) < nbytes; j++) + bytes[i + j] = data >> (j * 8);
Ditto put_unaligned_le32() ?
+ } +}
I'm wondering what else you open coded instead of using helpers we already have.
+ writel(cmd->cmd_hi, master->regs + COMMAND_QUEUE_PORT); + writel(cmd->cmd_lo, master->regs + COMMAND_QUEUE_PORT);
hmm... writesl()?
+ info->pid = (u64)readl(master->regs + SLV_PID_VALUE);
Why explicit casting?
+ u32 r; + + + core_rate = clk_get_rate(master->core_clk);
Too many blank lines in between.
+ +
Ditto.
+ /* Prepare DAT before launching DAA. */
+ for (pos = 0; pos < master->maxdevs; pos++) {
+ if (olddevs & BIT(pos))
+ continue;
+
+ ret = i3c_master_get_free_addr(m, last_addr + 1);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return -ENOSPC;
+ master->addrs[pos] = ret;+ p = (ret >> 6) ^ (ret >> 5) ^ (ret >> 4) ^ (ret >> 3) ^ + (ret >> 2) ^ (ret >> 1) ^ ret ^ 1; + p = p & 1;
Is it parity calculus? Do we have something implemented in kernel already? Btw, https://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html#ParityNaive offered this v ^= v >> 4; v &= 0xf; v = (0x6996 >> v) & 1; -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko