Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] dt-bindings: drm/bridge: Document sn65dsi86 bridge bindings
From: Stephen Boyd <hidden>
Date: 2018-06-12 08:31:30
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-arm-msm
Quoting spanda@codeaurora.org (2018-06-05 21:50:16)
On 2018-06-05 20:50, Rob Herring wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 11:10:16AM +0530, Sandeep Panda wrote:quoted
Document the bindings used for the sn65dsi86 DSI to eDP bridge.
[...]
quoted
quoted
and + the second cell is used to specify flags. + See ../../gpio/gpio.txt for more information. +- #pwm-cells : Should be one. See ../../pwm/pwm.txt for description of + the cell formats. + +- clock-names: should be "refclk" +- clocks: Specification for input reference clock. The reference + clock rate must be 12 MHz, 19.2 MHz, 26 MHz, 27 MHz or 38.4 MHz. + +- lane-mapping: Specification to describe the logical to physical laneAs I mentioned in v7, we already have a property for this. It's called 'data-lanes' and defined in media/video-interfaces.txt. Use that. If you need polarity too, then add a property for that. And add it to video-interfaces.txt.The data-lanes property mentioned in media/video-interfaces.txt is referring to DSI/CSI lanes where assumption is clock lane is fixed at index 0. But here the we want to mention about eDP lanes which do not have dedicated clock lane. So can we still use the existing data-lanes property here?
Why is that a problem? It's just a property name. There are data-lanes and clock-lanes properties in the video-interfaces.txt file by the way. It would be nice if that document could be updated for displayport and DSI (e.g. clock-noncontinuous or link-frequencies) or even just mention in there that these can apply to DSI and displayport too. _______________________________________________ Freedreno mailing list Freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/freedreno