On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:46:07AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:

quoted

quoted

Finally, note that documentation (including kerneldoc) remains to be
written, but hopefully this will not hinder review given that the
current interfaces are fairly self-describing.

This all looks great.  Thanks for doing this work and adding a new
subsystem for something that has been asked for for many years.

All now merged in my tree, nice job!

I don't think discussion was finished on this one.

In particular, we agreed that /dev/gnssrawX would be better device
name, so that we still have place where to put proper abstraction
layer in future.

I did not agree with you on that. I said we could consider that name if
this was to be changed at all, which I do not think is necessary for
the reasons spelled out in this thread.

Johan