On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:11:17PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:

quoted

quoted

diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f1aaf761112b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+

checkpatch.pl warns about this line due to not using /* ... */ syntax
for headers. I could fix that up on my own, but it made me realize that
you are licensing this file under GPL-2.0+ only, whereas the .dts[i] is
supposed to be dual-licensed.

Can you please give your consent to make this

/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) */

You can change the license to GPL-2.0+ OR MIT.

quoted

like my S500 and S700 bindings?

Question: Should it still be GPL-2.0+ or the new GPL-2.0-or-later?

I think GPL-2.0+ is fine.

So... when I saw this I did wonder why one would knowly choose to use a
deprecated license identifier (https://spdx.org/licenses/ ).

However running `git diff v4.17..v4.18-rc1` through some filters does
indicate that GPL-2.0+ is the more popular choice by 256 to 0! Doesn't
mean you couldn't break the mould though ;-).


Daniel.